The court’s decision, which incredibly did not cite case law or a constitutional provision, was a show of legislative force.
The sexual harassment allegations against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas have been repeatedly undermined by their own creators. Reviving them is embarrassing.
Social conservatives embraced Roy Moore because they thought he was fighting for them. In fact, Moore was never a conservative to begin with.
Abortion providers in Texas don’t think the state should require them to kill a fetus before dismembering it in its mother’s womb.
In a dangerous new ruling, a federal court declared that a WWI memorial is unconstitutional because it’s in the shape of a Latin cross.
Today’s strong judicial activism goes against the purpose of the Supreme Court envisioned by the Founders, and defined in the Constitution.
Don’t believe the lie that Donald Trump will fight Roe v. Wade once elected. He could do more to damage the pro-life cause than Hillary ever could.
Rather than accepting the Supreme Court’s usurpations as ‘law of the land,’ Republicans should restore the court’s coequal status with Congress and the presidency.
It’s time for Congress to return the institution to an even-bodied court. Doing so would create a more legitimate and less politicized institution.
Twenty-five years ago today, Clarence Thomas was nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court. What a quarter-century.
The real sham against women is the Supreme Court’s false promises of protection. Clearly, shoddy, substandard, and incompetent abortionists provide mere ‘access’ to abortion.
In the few weeks since Antonin Scalia’s death, we are witnessing an unchecked liberal Supreme Court quartet.
Why would Ted Cruz, who has a well-stocked campaign, more delegates than Marco Rubio, and a strong ground game, give that up for a snowball’s chance at a SCOTUS confirmation?
Each side of same-sex politics is trying to comfortably fit into the legal shoe their opponent was wearing last year.
Progressive legal circles have warmly received Chief Justice John Roberts’ Obergefell v. Hodges dissent. That’s a problem.
If Justice Kennedy continues applying human dignity as a legal standard, then he is likely to continue shifting in favor of laws that defend the dignity of unborn human life.
Because every marriage statute discriminates about which relationships to condone, legalizing gay marriage only shifts the discrimination applied.
Even though it knocked a dental cartel, the Supreme Court’s recent licensing decision is no victory for economic liberty.
Indiana’s religious freedom law is almost identical to the federal law, and court precedent forbids these from being used to discriminate against anyone.
The Supreme Court justices considering King v. Burwell’s Obamacare case should take note of this famous example of textualism’s merits.
- Comey’s Memos Indicate Dossier Briefing Of Trump Was A SetupNew memos suggest Comey briefing of Trump was a setup tcontinue reading >
- Revealed: Robert Mueller’s FBI Repeatedly Abused Prosecutorial DiscretionEstablishment DC types who reflexively defend Mueller hcontinue reading >
- Let’s Apply The Sean Hannity Standard To ‘Objective’ Journalists With Hidden Political TiesIf Hannity is going to face such scrutiny, other self-pcontinue reading >