Although the order is more carefully crafted following months of review, Trump’s opponents will still fight it. But that doesn’t mean it will work.
A new poll released Wednesday indicates that restricting migration from majority-Muslim countries is a lot more popular than the mainstream media would have us believe.
The Supreme Court has substantially upheld a significant part of the executive power by which President Trump’s immigration order was issued.
The furor over Trump’s executive order on immigration isn’t about the Constitution. It’s about liberals’ contempt for Trump.
How increasingly letting states and citizens sue to stop laws and regulations they don’t like, such as President Trump’s immigration order, can politicize courts and end self-government.
A federal judge in Hawaii relied on his feelings and flawed interpretation of Trump’s campaign rhetoric to block his latest travel ban.
The new immigration executive order is better than the old one. Here are the main things it gets right, and the big questions it leaves unanswered.
What’s best for the refugees should be the question at hand. We can acknowledge and respect our cultural differences and consider that regional alternatives are a good solution.
As Trump considers fighting the courts or drafting another executive order, it’s important to remember many Americans view things very differently from the so-called mainstream.
Refugees are already subject to extreme vetting, and refugees are much less likely than the general American population to commits acts of violence.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
Not only do these Christians have hundreds of years of oppressed mentality to overcome, but Muslims, just like wife-beaters, increase their wrathful acts upon their victims when they seek help.
In responding to Donald Trump’s immigration executive order, once again mainstream media proved they are incapable of telling the whole truth, which sows confusion and fear.
Our family shouldn’t be threatened with a ‘punch in the face’ for seeking to protect our naturally born and adopted children from terrorism.
These pointless protests did little besides making it harder for tired folks from all over the world to get to their destination after what could have been a 12-hour flight.
People keep asking whether Trump’s executive order is constitutional. But it’s not just about what the government can do—it’s about what it should do.
Because of the administration’s excessive haste to act and media personalities’ haste to judge, reasonable discussion of American crisis migration policy has been all but snuffed out.
Rather than tell people what they can discuss politically, we should be listening and learning from our political opponents.
- 8 Worst Defenses Of FBI Agent’s Anti-Trump ‘Insurance Policy’ TextsHow do the media handle dramatic updates that counter tcontinue reading >
- Can We Be Honest About Women?Here’s a little secret we have to say out loud: Womencontinue reading >
- Trump Admin To Remove Climate Change From List Of National Security ThreatsThe National Security Strategy to be released on Mondaycontinue reading >