Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- What We Know So Far About The Justice Department’s Spygate Scandal InvestigationsWhen Barr testified before the Senate Judiciary Committcontinue reading >
- We All Need To Admit That America Has A Tattoo ProblemAmerica, we need to talk. You might not want to admit tcontinue reading >
- ‘Wine Country’ Is Just Terrible, And The Inside Jokes Might Be Why'Wine Country' is outright cringe-inducing from start tcontinue reading >