Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- Former Gun Control Candidate Charged With Shooting Her Campaign TreasurerThe former pro-gun control candidate has just been charcontinue reading >
- Did Fusion GPS’s Anti-Trump Researcher Avoid Surveillance With A Ham Radio?It seems Nellie Ohr was well aware the National Securitcontinue reading >
- Never Trumper Ben Shapiro Might Vote Trump, Says Primarying Him Would Be ‘Major Mistake’The president has shown himself to be a stronger promotcontinue reading >