Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Is Setting Women Back Light Years In PoliticsShe doesn't deserve to be lauded as millennials' feminicontinue reading >
- Anti-Gun Democrat’s Purchase Of ‘MeatEater’ Could Pose Big Problems For Hunter-Focused CompanyPeter Chernin, an anti-gun Democrat who called for a fecontinue reading >
- Court Rules Undercover Videos Of Planned Parenthood Selling Baby Body Parts As AuthenticThe court ruling refutes Planned Parenthood’s own talcontinue reading >