Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- We Can’t Have A Debate About Guns If Liberals Keep Lying About ThemThe falsehoods or misleading statistics offered by gun-continue reading >
- The Media Stopped Reporting The Russia Collusion Story Because They Helped Create ItThe press has played an active role in the Trump-Russiacontinue reading >
- Let’s Be Honest: Democrats Don’t Actually Care About DREAMersThe only interest Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have icontinue reading >