Because Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues to possess weapons of mass destruction, and has now used them twice, a U.S. response was warranted.
It’s clear the judges went through the exercise of writing an opinion so they could get to the outcome they wanted. The problem is, the outcome they wanted is, legally speaking, wrong.
- Latest Development In Flynn Case Proves Special Counsel Was A Cover For Taking Down TrumpHis former lawyer’s latest testimony establishes two continue reading >
- New York Times Fudged Book Sales Data To Torpedo ‘Justice on Trial’ Best-Seller RankingThe New York Times blatantly ignored sales data to torpcontinue reading >
- Dissent Can Be Patriotic, But Hating Your Own Country Isn’tThe grand question of our time may very well be the simcontinue reading >