Struggling to accept the consequences of electoral defeat, progressive activists are now desperately clinging to a wild conspiracy theory about how they can retain control of the Supreme Court.
Our efforts to diagnose and ‘rehabilitate’ prisoners do not bring about greater justice and reform. In practice, they achieve the opposite.
Democrats are so fixated on the politics of race they’re unable to imagine anything else matters.
It may be maddening to hear voices on the left support violent protests sometimes, and condemn it at other times. But there’s a method to this madness.
A pardon lets the accused avoid punishment, but sears her guilt into the public consciousness. After all, an innocent woman does not need to be pardoned.
Here are some of the lessons we must take into the political fight for the Supreme Court.
It took a unique combination of distrust, arrogance, and prosecutorial blunders to lead the Malheur occupiers to get away with their crimes.
Rolling Stone hopes claiming a ‘badge of shame’ will save them. Not likely.
If widely embraced, judicial engagement would give constitutional conservatives something to get genuinely excited about.
Progressives are prosecuting conservative dissenters for ‘hate crimes.’ Criminalizing politics not only crushes diversity—it’s just plain wrong.
A DOJ official responsible for keeping Congress up to date about the re-opened probe into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails appears to have leaked information to John Podesta.
After the New York Times revealed details of Hillary Clinton’s secret e-mail setup, John Podesta e-mailed, “We are going to have to dump all those e-mails.”
New details suggest the methods Hillary Rodham used to maneuver around procedural norms in the Kathy Shelton rape case bear striking similarities to her actions in her email scandal.
Congress in 1866 was concerned about an unpopular, reactionary president using the Supreme Court to restrict the people’s rights. In 2017, we will likely find ourselves in a similar spot.
‘We’re a nation of laws, not men. . . We have laws, and we apply them universally and equally for all people.’
As a matter of constitutional law, the Senate is fully within its powers to let the Supreme Court literally die out.
One does not have to have read the Clarence Thomas canon, like I have, to know that Jeffrey Toobin’s recent article in The New Yorker is nonsense.
- No, Senate Democrats Can’t Use The ‘Nuclear Option’ To Confirm Merrick GarlandStruggling to accept the consequences of electoral defecontinue reading >
- Did Democrats Learn Anything From Their Attack On The Filibuster?When Donald Trump, uninhibited by checks and balances, continue reading >
- Canadian Law Erasing Moms And Dads From State Documents Reduces Children To ChattelThis so-called ‘All Families are Equal Act’ is realcontinue reading >