After reading the latest installment in the ‘my husband disappoints me’ genre in The New York Times last weekend — this one penned by a clinical psychologist — I’d say we have a trend.
How can you claim to be a Christian, let alone a Christian minister, while denying one essential element after another of Jesus’ own life and teaching? Either Jesus is a liar or she is.
Progressive groups want ‘corporate America to blacklist senior people in the Trump administration.’ By this standard, a long list of American leaders will have to be ‘canceled’ too.
The Times is somewhere between misleading by omission and outright lying to their readers about the threats posed by lack of border security.
The New York Times decided to do a profile on the racist Black Hebrew Israelites this week that opens: ‘They are sidewalk ministers who use confrontation as their gospel.’
Americans have widely divergent ideas about what “American interests” looks like. Which ones is the FBI going to criminalize?
When Chinese President Xi Jinping’s autocracy asks Western companies to jump, the response is usually, ‘How high?’
Ilhan Omar has tweeted, ‘Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel.’ The New York Times didn’t see fit to discuss that in its profile.
Let the president, as he is charged to do under the Constitution, consider whether the outcome in this case is one where justice wears a countenance too sanguinary and cruel.
Shame on The New York Times for printing this unsupported and irresponsible speculation. This kind of journalism is doing real harm to our democracy.
They are scared they’ll lose themselves, that it will be too hard, that they’ll never get back the life they are enjoying. The opposite is true.
Should The New York Times, which published Trump-killing fan fiction, be held to the same standard it expects of the president?
Mainstream media conveniently downplay or even ignore this fact in story after story on the ins and outs of race-based admission processes in colleges.
Acting as if the results of the senator’s DNA test are a vindication of her initial claims is an assault on reason.
Inadequate—and blameworthy—are expressions of sympathy for the abused that disguise the elephant in the rectory. The first responsibility is to call things by their right name.
American liberal media are so biased that they are delighted to take the foreign leaders’ laughter as vindication of their bias against Trump.
The activist left in America is hardly focused on the actual atrocities gay people face around the globe. Instead, they’re much more concerned with cudgeling Christian conservatives.
Michael Smerconish noticed something odd about The New York Times coverage of a new allegation: A sentence undermining the accuser’s story had been deleted.
A New York Times article scrutinizing inside jokes in the 1983 yearbook of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s Georgetown Preparatory School hid multiple problems with its claims.
Whatever happens to the Brett Kavanaugh, Democrats have normalized another illiberal position in their pretend crusade to save America from Donald Trump.
- The Conventional Wisdom About Millennial Suffering Is A MythDespite a sense of unearned victimhood, millennials havcontinue reading >
- In Wake Of Federal Tax Reform, Blue States Scramble To Hide High TaxesDemocrats insist richer people need to pay more taxes. continue reading >
- Obama-Era State Department Official Provides More Evidence Of FISA AbuseKathleen Kavalec’s notes provide at least four more pcontinue reading >