We worry our son will pick up ideas and behaviors we do not support that will someone else will reinforce. So we’re taking an active role in his life, even though it requires more of us.
The research overwhelmingly suggests the sexes’ earnings gap is mostly not caused by sexism. It’s not an unequal pay for equal work issue, it’s largely that women do different work.
‘In Angela Merkel, German Women Find Symbol, but Not Savior’ mistakenly directs disappointment towards Angela Merkel when the fault really lies in feminism.
Those of us who do homemaking know that it is intellectually demanding work. But we’re still happy to denigrate our roles. Why?
Why are liberal outlets like the Huffington Post praising a movie star who took a break to raise her kids when they attack normal women for making the same choice?
Our nostalgia for the 1950s blinds us to the reality that the stay-at-home mom was always a historical anomaly. As the economy declines, so may this option. What can families do then?
The question isn’t whether God uses mothers to advance the gospel, but how.
You think it’s hard out in the world? Try staying at home and keeping things running.
Some men won’t “let” their wives quit working even though they want to. This is what decades of denigrating the work of stay-at-home mothers leads to.
Not everything about being a stay at home mom to your children is horrible.
We measure careers by earnings, specialization, and competition for entry. But motherhood deserves entirely different criteria for respect.
President Obama doesn’t understand the research about working moms. They actually get more done, become better managers, and have a higher quality of life.
Don’t pretend you know the right answer to the many hard choices women must make, Mr. President.
President Obama just took a bizarre swipe at stay-at-home mothers. Here are three problems with his argument.
- The 15 Biggest Box Office Bombs Of Summer 2019Here's an entertaining list of the worst offerings to gcontinue reading >
- Slavery In America Did Not Begin In 1619, And Other Things The New York Times Gets WrongThe 1619 Project isn’t mostly about helping Americanscontinue reading >
- The Empty Relevance Of Never TrumpThe prominence of Never Trump pundits in liberal outletcontinue reading >