If Peterson can be tripped up by the most obvious and easily refuted rejections of his non-compelled-speech program, the very thing that propelled his rise to fame, what good is he?
While many conservatives predicted Ireland’s abortion ban repeal would lead to the loss of other freedoms, it’s surprising how quickly it’s happening.
This case was a loss for both sides from the start, because of what it signals about tolerance of opposing views in this country.
The ruling seems like a victory for religious freedom, but a closer look shows three things about the ruling that people who believe letting others live authentically can’t afford to ignore.
The Supreme Court’s religious freedom ruling is so narrow it allows bureaucrats to violate your conscience as long as they’re more polite when they do it.
Don’t be fooled by the Supreme Court’s 7-2 ruling. A menacing view of the First Amendment lurks in the details of the Masterpiece Cakeshop case.
Jack Phillips objected to baking a cake for the couple on religious grounds. The Supreme Court overturned a Colorado ruling that his business must bake the cake or face severe consequences.
A non-profit, public interest law firm which focuses on religious freedom issues has been booted from AmazonSmile, after the Southern Read Full Article >
Read the bill. There is no religious exemption. There is no restriction to mental health professionals. This is not simply a ‘gay conversion ban.’
The Founders understood that freedom was not merely the unbridled ability to live according to one’s appetites and desires, but the ability to do what is right and to live virtuous lives.
This isn’t just about my gun. It’s about every single individual’s fundamental right to liberty.
A North Carolina magistrate thought she lost everything when she was forced to resign from her job due to her religious beliefs. She sued the state over discrimination and a federal judge awarded her $300,000.
This is a major setback for advocates of parental rights and religious freedom.
The concern is not about denying a service to an individual based on gender identity, it is an issue of requiring a medical professional to take an action he deeply and morally opposes.
There is simply no historical ground upon which Politico can claim that protecting the right of medical professionals not to participate in abortion has been ‘controversial’ since Roe v. Wade.
Six state attorneys general seek to force the Little Sisters to violate their consciences or pay millions in fines, all without having to face these religious caregivers in a court of law.
The Christian small business owners involved in these lawsuits have no desire to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, nor do they ask for the right to do so.
Not only is there no constitutional warrant for securing ‘dignity,’ but the equal protection of such a right is impossible. Relying on government to ensure it results in state-imposed orthodoxy.
Cake artist Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop delivered the following statement during a news conference Tuesday.
- TIME Stands By Erroneous Crying Girl Cover Story Because Of Its Propaganda Value'The June 12 photograph of the 2-year-old Honduran girlcontinue reading >
- Victor Davis Hanson On The Fate Of The West, Trump, And The ResistanceBen Weingarten interviews writer and scholar Victor Davcontinue reading >
- Report: McCain Staffer Urged IRS To Conduct ‘Financially Ruinous’ Investigations Of Non-ProfitsAn IRS employee's version of a meeting including Lois Lcontinue reading >