School reforms parachuted in from Silicon Valley failed to make much difference for kids. They did make Zuckerberg a lifelong friend and gave Booker the platform to win himself a Senate seat.
Mark Zuckerberg claims that “we,” as society, now have a responsibility to help him keep people “safe” from hate speech. We have no such obligation.
Author Franklin Foer joins Ben Domenech on Federalist Radio to discuss why letting big tech companies control our knowledge is an existential threat.
Facebook has it wrong. The best way to eliminate bad speech is to fight it with better speech, not pretend it doesn’t exist.
When a public figure accepts responsibility for misbehavior without actually communicating any explicit consequences that follow, it is merely a soft manipulation of the public.
Cruz asked Zuckerberg if Facebook considered itself a ‘neutral public forum,’ making the Silicon Valley billionaire squirm.
‘This is the real world, not a spy novel. And in the real world, what Cambridge Analytica was promising simply doesn’t work.’
The claims of Democratic Senators and Congressmen are utterly absurd if you know even a little about how Facebook works.
The Google memo controversy could tear up the implicit social contract we’ve all accepted with the big technology companies to whom we entrust our data.
In repeating a story about Alaska as a model of the basic income, Mark Zuckerberg offers us a pretty good guide on how to bamboozle a billionaire.
- Latest Development In Flynn Case Proves Special Counsel Was A Cover For Taking Down TrumpHis former lawyer’s latest testimony establishes two continue reading >
- New York Times Fudged Book Sales Data To Torpedo ‘Justice on Trial’ Best-Seller RankingThe New York Times blatantly ignored sales data to torpcontinue reading >
- Dissent Can Be Patriotic, But Hating Your Own Country Isn’tThe grand question of our time may very well be the simcontinue reading >