It’s no coincidence that most of the current and former Democrat 2020 presidential candidates advocate banning guns. Democrats have been trying to disarm black and other Americans since the Civil War.
Heller preemptively rejected the First Circuit’s notion that the right to keep and bear arms should be balanced against government’s claimed interest in banning guns and magazines.
Sanders says confiscating existing AR-15s from their owners would be unconstitutional, but that prohibiting people from becoming AR-15 owners wouldn’t be.
All top 10 Democrat presidential candidates advocate banning the most popular rifles and ammunition magazines in America. Five don’t want to wait for their current owners to die.
It’s not only to prevent a Democrat landslide in 2020. It’s because Democrats will settle for nothing less than gun confiscation.
The habitually dishonest Bill Clinton is mischaracterizing his ‘ban’ to help Democrats impose one with far more severe consequences.
If gun control advocates are really worried about fatality numbers, restrictive firearm policies are not the place to start.
Those who demand we #dosomething have no plan to protect innocent men, women, and children from mass shootings. They have a hashtag to placate voters.
New Zealand’s government wants you to know that their first pass at gun confiscation was a great success, but a look at the facts may tell you otherwise.
Northam is seeking a ban on standard-capacity magazines, modern sporting rifles, suppressors, extreme-risk protection orders, mandatory home storage laws, and more.
Citigroup’s getting asked some hard questions about the fiscal sanity of their decision to discriminate against firearms businesses, and their answers aren’t likely to soothe investors.
SCOTUS hasn’t taken up a gun rights case in nearly a decade. Now they’ll consider which protections extend to people transporting guns outside their homes.
No one should be naïve enough to fall for Democrats’ pretenses that these bills are aimed at reducing crime.
President Trump is betraying his promise to protect our Second Amendment rights (and for no meaningful public safety benefit).
Knowing that Americans do not want to give up their right to keep and bear arms, many gun control supporters peddle a soothing lie wrapped in panic.
‘I do not believe like weapons of mass destruction like the AR-15 belong in civilian hands.’
The ballot box, not the Supreme Court, is where the fight for the right to keep and bear arms will be won or lost.
With Justice Brett Kavanaugh, American gun owners know that a majority of Supreme Court justices now support the Heller interpretation of the right to keep and bear arms.
Conservatives and libertarians should take note of this new strategy that could be used to restrict gun rights under the guise of safety.
His record shows Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh supports ‘common sense gun control,’ while the Left remains out of the mainstream.
- If CNN Can’t Take Punches, They Shouldn’t Be Throwing ThemCNN bashes conservative media on a daily basis, but whecontinue reading >
- How Trump Can Triple His Support Among Black Voters In 2020Trump is uniquely gifted to bring black America back incontinue reading >
- Virginia State Democrats Launch Into An Anti-Gun Law FrenzyThe Virginia legislature flipped in 2019, and Democratscontinue reading >