This is tantamount to saying that individuals have the right to use and occupy someone else’s property against his will. This is a wholesale denial of property and sovereignty rights.
Our rights aren’t contingent on a cost-benefit analysis. Whether guns are risky isn’t the point, but whether guns are a reasonable means of self-defense.
- Incoming Democrat Chairman Makes Definitive Case Against Impeaching TrumpTwenty years ago, Jerrold Nadler argued in Congress thacontinue reading >
- Here’s What’s Weird About Robert Mueller’s Latest Michael Flynn FilingRobert Mueller’s reply brief revealed several new tidcontinue reading >
- You’re Not Allowed To Knock Trump For Stormy Daniels If You Watch PornOur culture is so far gone that we don't consider secrecontinue reading >