Cosmopolitan’s Jill Filipovic has constructed an argument against originalism that should embarrass even the most disinterested of history students.
During Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation hearings senators and commenters are batting around words like ‘textualist,’ ‘originalist,’ and ‘evolutionist.’ Here’s an illustration.
Instead of doing the serious work they were elected to do, congressional Democrats spent the day virtue-signaling to their base.
Even a cursory look at Neil Gorsuch’s opinions shows his disdain for a conventional wisdom that has unfortunately guided the style of countless writers.
Only by holding nominees’ feet to the substantive constitutional fire can we make confirmation hearings great again.
Chuck Schumer’s case against Neil Gorsuch relies on an argument that distorts the entire purpose of the Supreme Court.
If the word ‘sex,’ as used in Title IX and its implementing regulations, is ambiguous, there is truly no limit to what an agency could redefine under the auspices of ‘expertise.’
Obama-era rules empower meat inspectors to become speech inspectors, and that’s created a crazy situation at one farm in Michigan.
Let’s stop pretending trans kids care about where they go to the bathroom. The LGBTQ movement cares because that’s how they advance their agenda.
A current Supreme Court case shows just how problematic it is when people do not have the tools to speak up, and how failure to do so might jeopardize constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court’s ability to issue a binding opinion on any subject that no one else could overturn is inconsistent with the checks and balances the Framers crafted.
The time for the Supreme Court to step in and guard the principles established in District of Columbia v. Heller has come.
Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, an Episcopalian judge, studied under one of the most influential living philosophers in the world, the Catholic natural law theorist John M. Finnis.
Abortion advocates are attacking Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch for agreeing with the Supreme Court’s decisions in the Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters of the Poor cases.
We hold opposite political views and hail from different regions. Yet we stand united in our support of Neil Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court.
Wisconsin’s junior senator could not hold out for more than 48 hours before giving in to deep partisanship and vindictiveness on Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.
Senate Republicans can confirm President Trump’s Supreme Court nominees without using the filibuster-killing nuclear option. Here’s how.
Americans often think the Supreme Court falls into ‘conservative’ and ‘liberal’ camps. But justices usually care more about the law than about politics.
Attacking bureaucracy and nominating a solid originalist to the Supreme Court? Be still, my beating heart.
- An Undocumented Man Allegedly Raped A 14-Year-Old, Now Democrats Want To Protect Him From DeportationLast week, an undocumented man was arrested for allegedcontinue reading >
- Pelosi Stumped When Asked Who Leader Of Democratic Party Is, Picks Obama And ClintonAs for the three cycles of electoral shellacking that gcontinue reading >
- Cosmopolitan Doesn’t Understand How The Constitution WorksCosmopolitan’s Jill Filipovic has constructed an argucontinue reading >