On Thursday, a federal district court judge upheld Massachusetts’ ‘assault-weapon’ ban.
Law professor Helen Alvaré’s new book, ‘Putting Children’s Interests First in US Family Law and Policy,’ details the alarming number of ways the law privileges ‘consensual adult sexual expression,’ regardless of the consequences.
SCOTUS reporter Kevin Daley joins the Federalist Radio Hour to talk all the latest court and justice stories including #FreeAdnan, the NIFLA case, and more.
The major question discussed was what California could require of medical facilities under the state’s authority to regulate the practice of medicine.
Based on oral arguments, even the liberal justices didn’t like a law that discriminates against pro-life pregnancy clinics.
A powerful amicus brief seeks to bring humanity to a complex legal question about free speech overlaid with the also-controversial issue of abortion.
NARAL attempts to undermine crisis pregnancy centers by identifying ‘deceptive practices’ they use to lie to and mistreat women. Yet NARAL offers no citations or evidence.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals filled in some of the details about a ‘barely 14-year-old’ illegal immigrant who changed her mind about getting an abortion with the help of the federal government.
If stripping unions of the ability to coerce workers is a crippling event, then it’s an event worth celebrating.
Ginsburg’s comments about due process are a common sense breath of fresh air in an increasingly polarized cultural climate.
“Janus v. AFSME” is a case about restoring workers’ first amendment rights. Dan DiSalvo joins Federalist Radio to discuss the power and money unions hold.
The justices shouldn’t extend law enforcement’s reach beyond our borders. More importantly, Congress needs to update a 30-year-old law for the digital age.
We have divergent interpretive theories that map onto ideologically sorted parties, so is it any surprise that elections are high-stakes for judges?
Trump’s first year in office has turned out much better than expected, but don’t let that blind us to some of the long-term costs of Trumpism.
Monday, the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on whether sexual orientation discrimination is illegal under Title VII.
While there is always a risk of reading too much into Supreme Court justices’ questions during oral argument, there is often much to be gleaned.
Except for justices Kagan and Ginzburg, an uneasiness about the case was evident to a greater and lesser degree among the other 7 Supreme Court justices.
Cake artist Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop delivered the following statement during a news conference Tuesday.
If I encountered an individual morally uncomfortable with participating in an activity with me and my boyfriend, it would be uncomfortable for me to force her.
Most justices first frame the issue by using judicial discretion of one kind or another to remove from consideration the nature of the product requested for a same-sex wedding.
- Comey’s Memos Indicate Dossier Briefing Of Trump Was A SetupNew memos suggest Comey briefing of Trump was a setup tcontinue reading >
- Poor Andrew Cuomo Struggles With Life Of Zero Intersectionality Points'As a New Yorker, I am a Muslim. As a New Yorker, I am continue reading >
- The Latest Evidence From Norway Shows Female Hiring Quotas Hurt WomenThe latest data from Norway and some other European coucontinue reading >