Robert Mueller’s investigation is showy and politically important, but it is not unique. It embodies our administrative state.
If there were ever an application to appear in court where one does not practice that warrants denial, Michael Avenatti’s is it.
The proposal is simple: when Democrats next hold the presidency and Senate, they should pack the courts to ensure that the Left can achieve its goals.
As we enter the second year of Robert Mueller’s sprawling investigation, Hanlon’s Razor teaches us to ‘Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.’
The unsourced document details various ‘suspicious financial transactions’ allegedly made to Trump lawyer Michael Cohen through a limited liability company.
In his obsessive pursuit of President Trump, Robert Mueller has deprived Trump of his right to the counsel of his choice. Setting this precedent for Trump sets it for everyone.
I do hope alleged Donald Trump paramour Stormy Daniels is Michael Avenatti’s only client, because I find it difficult to believe he’s not neglecting his other cases and clients.
On the cases with less political valence the justices can ‘nerd out’ on legal theories and reveal their jurisprudential minds when they know their decisions won’t make the front pages.
Now that the memos have been perused, the theories of a number of legal commentators have unsurprisingly proved to be full of errors, irrelevancies, and overstatements.
If Stormy Daniels’ lawyer Michael Avenatti truly feels he has a strong case, he would wait while it played out in court. Instead, he has bought a ticket to the circus.
Anders Walker’s thoughtful new book, ‘The Burning House,’ examines a tough question: Can we achieve real equality while preserving African-Americans’ strong cultural identity that was forged in violence and oppression?
Despite one of the laxest abortion laws in the world, on rare occasions women have been prosecuted and jailed in the U.K. for illegal abortions.
Set aside the fact that an article encouraging male lawyers to train their female colleagues into dominatrix-like submission could only be found in the deep recesses of 4chan.
Whether someone is a ‘target’ as opposed to a ‘subject’ of an investigation is a distinction without a difference.
On Thursday, a federal district court judge upheld Massachusetts’ ‘assault-weapon’ ban.
Law professor Helen Alvaré’s new book, ‘Putting Children’s Interests First in US Family Law and Policy,’ details the alarming number of ways the law privileges ‘consensual adult sexual expression,’ regardless of the consequences.
What is more in accord with the rule of law: four justices usurping the power of a co-equal branch of government, or a legislature doing exactly what the state constitution allows?
Texts revealed a relationship between FBI agent Peter Strzok and Judge Rudolph Contreras. Does that cast suspicion on Contreras’ recusal from the Flynn case Strzok investigated?
Author Ryan Holiday examines the nearly unbelievable conspiracy of how Hulk Hogan and few secret individuals were able to dismantle the infamous Gawker.
Did Robert Mueller’s office withhold other evidence in Michael Flynn’s prosecution, either from the FISA court or from Flynn’s attorneys? There is reason to believe so.
- BREAKING: E-mails Show FBI Brass Discussed Dossier Briefing Details With CNNNew e-mails show that FBI brass discussed details aboutcontinue reading >
- Lying Liar James Clapper Just Lied Again About His Previous Lies About NSA Spying'I made a mistake. I didn't lie.'continue reading >
- The Left And The Right Aren’t Hearing The Same Jordan PetersonA New York Times Magazine hit piece says more about thecontinue reading >