All too often, lower courts have used a bad legal doctrine to stop states and local governments from protecting the unborn, even when Supreme Court case law would allow it.
The question remains: Can cops still take your stuff even if you haven’t been convicted of a crime? What if it doesn’t constitute an excessive fine?
So long as universal injunctions exist, plaintiffs will be able to impose their policy preferences on the entire country, if they find a willing judge.
As states rush to legalize third-trimester abortions, consider how pro-abortion ideology results in a ripple effect of injustice and tragedy.
Documents obtained from Rhode Island Family Court must concern any person who questions whether it’s a good idea to chemically and surgically mutilate children.
The passage of New York’s Reproductive Health Act and the jollification that followed it mark a turning point on abortion, just as John Calhoun’s speech did about slavery.
Late Friday, a federal judge’s office confirmed that several documents that would shed light on the special counsel’s lead prosecutor’s alleged misconduct are missing from the court record.
If the Supreme Court ultimately declines the case, it would be another failure on the road to ending the injustices abortion perpetuates.
Now pets can enjoy the same anguish, manipulation, bribery, and other petty power battles that children must already endure during divorces.
The film’s worshipful portrayal of Ginsburg as a pioneering champion of equal rights for women provides no indication of an intellectual inconsistency that would have shown her as fallibly human.
The bill, which has passed House and Senate and is headed to President Trump’s desk, would be an obvious step in the right direction.
The FBI’s conduct with Flynn is a troubling display of the government using its power against a citizen to achieve the effect it desired.
What they were able to do to the Constitution implicitly through the courts, many progressives are now calling to be done externally at the expense of the judiciary’s independence.
A sentencing memorandum against President Trump’s former lawyer candidly lays out the federal case against Trump for campaign finance crimes.
In the feud between President Trump and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, both are wrong. Judges aren’t partisan hacks, but they do have different approaches to jurisprudence.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts’ attempt to defend the independence of the judiciary, in light of President Trump’s comments that courts are politicized, did more harm than good.
The positions are not necessarily in conflict, but prudent people should avoid support for the death penalty anyway.
It should go without saying that FGM is a horrific form of child abuse. That said, Bernard Friedman reached the correct legal conclusion in dismissing the FGM and conspiracy charges.
- The Public Reckoning Over Russiagate Will Not Be TelevisedThere will be no public mea culpa from the media for twcontinue reading >
- The Electoral College Still Makes Sense Because We’re Not A DemocracyWhat appears to deprive the populace of its power to decontinue reading >
- Black Lives Matter Founder: ‘The Clintons Use Black People For Votes’Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza says Hillarycontinue reading >