Although couched in judicious language, the majority opinion leaves no doubt that Sullivan’s actions were not just wrong but a fundamental abuse of our system of government.
The majority in the Flynn ruling handed Sullivan a face-saving out, but will the judge accept defeat or escalate matters, proving his bias and intemperance?
DOJ informed a federal court on Tuesday that it had discovered previously undisclosed notes about Michael Flynn from fired former FBI agent Peter Strzok.
A DOJ attorney’s downplaying of the evidence of prosecutorial misconduct only cements in the public’s mind the idea that career federal prosecutors are part of the swamp.
By opening his courtroom to John Gleeson and other anti-Flynn amici, Judge Sullivan has converted the judicial branch into an emissary of the Democratic Party.
Today’s oral arguments suggest the court is hesitant to order Sullivan to dismiss the criminal case against Flynn — at least at this time. How the court will rule likely rests in the hands of Judge Karen Henderson.
In his 70-plus-page brief, retired Judge John Gleeson gave Judge Emmet Sullivan exactly what he wanted: a political hit on Trump that the press could parlay into a new faux scandal.
Judge Emmet Sullivan appeared as unofficial amicus curiae for the Resistance in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in the Michael Flynn criminal case yesterday.
DOJ’s top lawyer unloaded on the behavior of the anti-Flynn federal judge who has refused to dismiss the unlawful charges against Michael Flynn.
Twenty legal luminaries led by Harvard professor Laurence Tribe have written a brief urging Judge Emmet Sullivan to reject the government’s motion to dismiss the Michael Flynn case.
Those condemning the DOJ’s decision to drop the charges against Michael Flynn ignore the growing evidence of misconduct by both the FBI and the federal prosecutors.
In a rare move, a three-judge panel ordered the presiding judge in the criminal case against Flynn to respond to his attorney’s petition for a writ of mandamus.
Sullivan should not embark on any contempt proceeding against Michael Flynn. Doing so would be a misuse of his contempt power.
The U.S. Constitution makes clear that the judiciary has no business second-guessing prosecutorial decisions. That’s what Michael Flynn judge Emmet Sullivan decided to do.
Absent reconsideration or reversal of his order, Judge Emmet Sullivan has just ensured that the Russia collusion hoax will be relitigated on the federal docket.
The unsealing of the FBI’s closing memo on the Flynn investigation made two things clear: The FBI had no proper predication for investigating Flynn, and the confidential human source should be investigated for making false statements to the FBI.
New documents in the Michael Flynn case cemented that a small cadre of high-level FBI agents set a perjury trap for President Trump’s then-national security advisor.
The original defense team for Michael Flynn rejected multiple congressional immunity offers, saying Flynn wouldn’t testify without Mueller’s approval.
New facts in the Michael Flynn case call into question the voluntariness of Flynn’s plea. Judge Sullivan should dismiss the charges to send a clear message: Outrageous prosecutorial coercion will not be tolerated.
New documents filed under seal in federal court include exculpatory information about former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
- Schiff Learned Of Russian ‘Bounty’ Intelligence In February, Withheld Information From Congress, And Took No ActionTop committee staff for Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), thcontinue reading >
- 5 Ways You Can Fight Back In The Cultural Civil WarIt can be hard for ordinary Americans who oppose the racontinue reading >
- Americans Should Never Again Comply With Pandemic Lockdown OrdersBy treating Black Lives Matters protests differently thcontinue reading >