The problem for climate change alarmists is that warming is already here, yet somehow humanity slogs onward, living longer, safer, richer lives.
Why aren’t liberals like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi celebrating the fact that fewer Americans are driving this summer?
Trump’s first year in office has turned out much better than expected, but don’t let that blind us to some of the long-term costs of Trumpism.
The questions people should really be asking are why Syria joined the Paris agreement and why it chose to do so now, two years after the agreement was first adopted.
‘How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science’ is The New York Times’ latest anthropological study of the strange species known as ‘Republicans.’
The columnist who wrote an entire column in 2011 that derisively compared global warming with religion now believes that humans are responsible for climate change.
Your hysterics surrounding the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris global warming arrangement have finally driven it home for us: this isn’t working.
The media cheered when French President Macron shook U.S. President Trump’s hand really hard. Now they’re reporting it helped doom their beloved Paris deal.
Why do Democrats keep losing on climate change? This is what happens when science is hijacked in pursuit of ideologically driven economic policies.
I’m fed up with the anti-anti-anti-Trumpers, so now I’m anti-anti-anti-anti-Trump. Welcome to the tangled web of stupid partisan bickering in 2017.
So what are the consequences of Donald Trump pulling America out of the Paris Agreement on global warming? Bad news: the planet is going to die.
Democracy dies in hyperbole.
Obama’s Paris climate legacy lived by his pen and should die by Trump’s.
Environmentalists scream about fossil fuels and carbon dioxide, yet they’re afraid to even mention the two best alternatives.
What will be labeled a global triumph will in reality likely be a tragedy for rich and poor countries alike, and especially for the poor.
One wonders why this president would unilaterally pursue a Paris agreement that does nothing more than hurt the country he took an oath to protect.
Ebell says the Paris agreement is a potential disaster for humankind, and not beneficial to the planet.
The Paris climate change agreement is empty symbolism. So why are its supporters just bursting with triumphalism?
- In Wake Of Federal Tax Reform, Blue States Scramble To Hide High TaxesDemocrats insist richer people need to pay more taxes. continue reading >
- Hunt’s Apologizes For Assuming Manwich’s SexHunt’s, the company known for making tomato products,continue reading >
- The Conventional Wisdom About Millennial Suffering Is A MythDespite a sense of unearned victimhood, millennials havcontinue reading >