After having previously insisted there is no reason to delay Michael Flynn’s sentencing, the government has asked the judge to put both the briefing and the sentencing hearing on hold.
If federal prosecutors made such a basic blunder concerning key evidence, what other mistakes lay buried in the undisclosed evidence?
These close connections between the Washington Post’s David Ignatius and people connected to U.S. and U.K. intelligence raise grave concerns about the deep state using media to push propaganda.
Whether Judge Emmett Sullivan will schedule oral argument after receiving these latest filings is yet to be seen. And how he will rule is anyone’s guess.
‘Mr. Flynn will ask this Court to dismiss the entire prosecution based on the outrageous and un-American conduct of law enforcement officials and the subsequent failure of the prosecution to disclose this evidence.’
While Sidney Powell’s latest motion barely comprised two pages, the implications are multi-pronged and monumental.
With each new court filing, the public learns more about the government’s manipulation of Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn.
‘This was another case without a crime—brought by prosecutors who were willing to criminalize innocent behavior in furtherance of their own agenda,’ says Sidney Powell.
We now know more of the strands of SpyGate that Sidney Powell has weaved together since taking over as Michael Flynn’s defense attorney a few short months ago.
Svetlana Lokhova pieced together an apparent coordinated effort that connected U.S. and British intelligence and media outlets to paint her as a Russian spy and take down Flynn — creating a scandal for President Trump.
Lawyer Sidney Powell’s bigger plan is to expose the breadth and depth of SpyGate and how flaying Michael Flynn lay at the heart of the soft coup attempt.
What should have been a quick hearing turned into a 45-minute preview of Sidney Powell’s plan to combat what she characterized as egregious government misconduct.
The question is whether Michael Flynn was affected by efforts to get Trump, and whether Judge Sullivan will keep him from reviewing the evidence that could prove prosecutorial misconduct.
New information shows the intelligence community withheld extremely relevant information from the special counsel’s office. What else did it withhold? Robert Mueller should say.
His former lawyer’s latest testimony establishes two facts, both of which benefit Michael Flynn and both of which the media has missed.
In the escalating dispute between government attorneys and former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn’s new lawyer, the latter has the better argument.
Was there a conflict of interest between Michael Flynn and his Covington and Burling attorneys who used to represent him? New facts unfold.
Attorney General William Barr reiterated his intention to find out why the Obama administration launched an investigation into Trump’s presidential campaign.
Michael Flynn’s new attorney Sidney Powell suggested the special counsel may not have produced classified information relevant to Flynn’s case. Powell intends to obtain it.
- Impeachment Is Slowly Destroying Democrats’ 2020 Political HopesThe Democratic effort to impeach Trump and overturn thecontinue reading >
- Biden Fat Shames Iowa Voter Who Says Hunter’s Ukraine Work Is DisqualifyingAn Iowa voter criticized Joe Biden for his son's dealincontinue reading >
- The Feds Don’t Need To Tell You Or Get A Warrant To Collect Your Emails And Phone RecordsIn reality, the government can obtain electronic communcontinue reading >