Schiff was not telling the truth when he kept dripping out lies to compliant reporters. Because he helped them accomplish their political goals against their nemesis Trump, however, they have not held him accountable.
Just when you thought Adam Schiff had reached maximum sleaze, word breaks he likely mischaracterized evidence related to Trump’s impeachment trial.
Rep. Devin Nunes succeeded in exposing numerous problems with FISA applications, later confirmed by Inspector General Michael Horowitz. For this, he was slimed.
Following the inspector general’s FISA report that proved nearly every sentence wrong in Rep. Adam Schiff’s last high-profile report, Schiff’s work should be deemed worthless.
Rep. Adam Schiff joked about the bizarre “pee tape” rumor from the discredited Democratic-funded Steele Dossier on “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert.”
Nearly two years later, the inspector general’s report vindicates the Nunes memo while showing that the Schiff memo was riddled with lies and false statements.
The top Republican on the House intel committee claimed in a lawsuit filed Tuesday that CNN’s claim that he traveled to Vienna in December 2018 to meet with a former Ukrainian official is completely false.
Their latest effort against the top Republican on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence is to accuse him, without evidence, of secretly meeting in Vienna with a former Ukrainian official ‘to get dirt on Biden.’
Vindman publicly and gratuitously questioned the policies of his commander in chief and did so in a partisan political setting. The U.S. military should nip that in the bud.
The first phase of impeachment did not go well for Democrats. It needed to be a time when support for the inquiry and impeachment grew. Instead, it shrank.
The supposed bombshells in Gordon Sondland’s testimony turned out to be the same harmless, hum drum, story we already knew.
Kurt Volker and Tim Morrison both testified that there was no quid pro quo, no bribery, and no extortion committed by the White House with Ukraine.
Vindman claimed to be the “principal advisor to the National Security Advisor and the president on Ukraine.” Turns out, he’s never spoken to the president.
Vindman said it would have been a “great honor” to serve in the position but added that he maintained that his loyalties lied with the United States.
When pressed on who Vindman spoke with about the call, Vindman said he spoke with two individuals not in the White House, then Adam Schiff cut him off, instructing him not to name the whistleblower.
The Democrats’ own witnesses have exonerated the president and have provided further evidence for investigating the Bidens for their business in Ukraine.
In the letter about his knowledge of the administration’s Ukraine policy, Johnson pushes back on the narrative being peddled by witnesses in the Democrats’ latest partisan impeachment efforts.
It’s become clear that some witnesses in the impeachment probe have their own agenda, and not all of them are courageous martyrs for the truth.
Former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch admitted that President Donald Trump did not engage in any kind of criminal activity related to Ukraine.
“The gentlewoman is not recognized,” Schiff asserted again and again as Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., tried to yield time to Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y.
- WATCH: CBS News Posts Fraudulent Video Of ICU Nurse Crying Over Poor Working ConditionsCBS News posted a video of a nurse who claimed she quitcontinue reading >
- Why Severe Social Distancing Might Actually Result In More Coronavirus DeathsWhat the media and policymakers are not telling us is tcontinue reading >
- Why Inspector General Michael Atkinson Roundly Deserved To Be FiredHere are the details you need to know to fully understacontinue reading >