The experience of the Pacific Northwest provides more confirmation that greater government control over health care doesn’t deliver its promised benefits.
Republicans should welcome any chance to highlight the astounding differences between Democratic Party health care rhetoric and Joe Biden’s past actions.
In many ways, Biden’s proposed default coverage represents a greater intrusion into the lives of Americans than Obamacare’s individual mandate.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo is flat wrong. Entities in both the United States and elsewhere—including within his own government—regularly put a dollar figure on human life.
The average family has spent tens of thousands of dollars in higher health insurance premiums because Obamacare has not met Obama’s pledges.
On Monday a summary of proposals by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi—which became public via leaks from lobbyists—provided an initial glimpse of the Democrat leadership’s policy approach.
Letting medical research continue to advance is a great argument against single-payer health care. So Republicans should make it.
We don’t need to adopt socialist ‘health care is a human right’ talking points in order to have a better, more efficient, free market system.
Despite good economic news, the high costs of health care remain the most pressing and worrisome domestic issue for families and individuals.
The only thing that keeps Obamacare from collapsing completely is that taxpayers are paying most or all of the premiums for the vast majority of people in the exchanges.
When it comes to bad policy—and bad strategy—the continuing resolution’s two-year postponement of Obamacare’s ‘Cadillac tax’ stands as its coup de grace.
Coverage is the big problem with U.S. health care. People with coverage have little or no incentive to economize, so costs balloon out of control.
If we insist on spending this staggering amount of money, we could spend it in a way that actually provides health care for the many Americans who supposedly desperately need it.
Going down the same failed Obamacare approach of more taxes and more spending will not lower health costs. And lower costs is what Republicans should prioritize.
There are many reasons conservatives should not remain fixated on the number of people with health insurance when designing an Obamacare alternative.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the media has thus far viewed the debate on an Obamacare replacement entirely through one liberal policy frame: How many people have health insurance cards.
With Donald Trump leading among men in battleground states, Hillary Clinton needs women like me to turn out in big numbers. No, thanks.
Doctors, nurses, support staff—they don’t work for free, and there is no reason they should.
- ‘Let’s Go Brandon Challenge’ Goes Viral On TikTokA new challenge has taken off on TikTok where users percontinue reading >
- How Texas Protected Its Vote From Getting ‘Rigged’ In 2020Mollie Hemingway’s new book, 'Rigged: How the Media, continue reading >
- Biden Forced Americans Into A Game Of Chicken Over Their Livelihoods, And They’re Not FlinchingSomebody's got to give in this game of chicken, and Bidcontinue reading >