The State Department announced that it found 23 “violations” in its review of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server to conduct official business.
While Americans remain split over whether Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump committed crimes, there should be a consensus on James Comey’s handling of both matters.
What we have here is an arrest of a man who pretended to be in the know with WikiLeaks (but wasn’t) and lied about it, and then lied about gossiping about Julian Assange in emails.
The political and investigative similarities between the TWA 800 and Hillary Clinton server cases, as well as the anti-Trump investigation, are eerie and deeply disturbing.
The inspector general’s direct answer whether James Comey lied was curious, in that his conclusion conflicts with facts and testimony detailed in his own report.
The Justice Department inspector general report about the FBI reveals a shocking anti-Trump, pro-Hillary bias endemic to the agency’s related investigations.
James Comey and the FBI decided to come clean on Anthony Weiner’s laptop because they thought they were protecting a Hillary Clinton presidency.
‘She might be our next president,’ Lisa Page told Peter Strzok. ‘The last thing you need us going in there loaded for bear.’
‘The policy of my administration is to encourage transparency,’ Obama told CBS News during the same interview in which he lied.
Tomorrow the inspector general for the U.S. Department of Justice will release a report about the DOJ and FBI’s handling of the Hillary Clinton investigation in the run-up to the 2016 election.
Andrew McCabe and Democrats maintain McCabe’s firing was part of President Trump’s attack on the FBI. That’s not what this inspector general report shows.
Two explosive stories about the FBI’s handling of the probe into Russia and the Trump campaign were downplayed by a suddenly incurious press corps.
Americans should be reassured that the federal law enforcement agencies are working to keep America safer rather than focused on revenge against political enemies.
The Republican senators want to know why they weren’t informed sooner, and ask flatly whether the FBI explanation for the loss is accurate.
If James Comey used sloppy language, he has an ethical obligation to clarify the record. Yet, even then, it changes absolutely nothing for Hillary Clinton.
We should not be afraid to tell the Nate Silvers of the world the uncomfortable but undeniable truth. James Comey did not cost Hillary Clinton the election. Hillary Clinton did.
James Comey’s letter to Congress was legitimate. And voters had every right to plug it into their electoral calculus.
So far, 22.5 million people have voted early. Some of those folks now have voter’s remorse thanks to new information about Hillary Clinton’s email scheme.
When liberals claim James Comey is endangering democracy, they mean he’s endangering the prospects of Hillary — which to them is the same thing.
In today’s media age, three weeks is a lifetime. Can anybody truly claim that those who voted in early October possessed all the facts they needed to make a truly informed decision?
- New York Times Kavanaugh Reporter Told Source What To SayYear-old texts contained in a Senate Judiciary Committecontinue reading >
- The Russian Spy Who Wasn’t? Defamation Case Accuses U.S., U.K. Intelligence Of Using Michael Flynn For Spygate HoaxSvetlana Lokhova pieced together an apparent coordinatecontinue reading >
- Here’s How Boris Johnson Gets The Brexit Deal The U.K. Really NeedsAlthough British Prime Minister Boris Johnson seems to continue reading >