In the few weeks since Antonin Scalia’s death, we are witnessing an unchecked liberal Supreme Court quartet.
Why would Ted Cruz, who has a well-stocked campaign, more delegates than Marco Rubio, and a strong ground game, give that up for a snowball’s chance at a SCOTUS confirmation?
Each side of same-sex politics is trying to comfortably fit into the legal shoe their opponent was wearing last year.
Progressive legal circles have warmly received Chief Justice John Roberts’ Obergefell v. Hodges dissent. That’s a problem.
If Justice Kennedy continues applying human dignity as a legal standard, then he is likely to continue shifting in favor of laws that defend the dignity of unborn human life.
Because every marriage statute discriminates about which relationships to condone, legalizing gay marriage only shifts the discrimination applied.
Even though it knocked a dental cartel, the Supreme Court’s recent licensing decision is no victory for economic liberty.
Indiana’s religious freedom law is almost identical to the federal law, and court precedent forbids these from being used to discriminate against anyone.
The Supreme Court justices considering King v. Burwell’s Obamacare case should take note of this famous example of textualism’s merits.
As gay-marriage laws move towards the U.S. Supreme Court, millennials’ support may eventually make any legal decisions moot.
The University of Texas still discriminates against white and Asian students in admissions because of race. A pending lawsuit could change that.
- Can You Spot The Difference Between These Two Insurrection Photos?Despite the media's disparate treatment, the most recencontinue reading >
- The Worst Is Yet To Come From Biden’s Vaccine CoercionThe vaccines do not preclude infection or transmission.continue reading >
- Transhumanists Gather In Spain To Plan Global TransformationTransVision 2021 saw technologists push radical visionscontinue reading >