The testimony of Strzok and Ohr further calls into question Democrats’ claim that the salacious Steele dossier played no role in the FBI’s decision to target the Donald Trump campaign.
The 268-page Bruce Ohr interview transcript provides some clarity, some comfort, but also more concerns over the handling of the Russia investigation.
Michael Cohen, President Trump’s former attorney, testified before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, despite his previous conviction for lying to Congress during his last testimony.
After nearly two years since the Steele dossier was published, it remains the cornerstone of the case for collusion. The dossier model has also given rise to similar operations.
The evidence continues to mount that during the Obama administration, the FBI used George Papadopoulos as a prop to legitimize investigating the Donald Trump campaign.
Past and present U.S. officials say the template for the current anti-Trump leak campaign can be traced back to the Obama administration’s efforts to sell the 2015 Iran nuclear deal.
Should Ohr show up ready to talk, House oversight committee chairman Trey Gowdy and his fellow members of Congress should get answers to these questions Tuesday.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions and concerned members of Congress should request the inspector general investigate Bruce Ohr’s role as a backdoor conduit to the FBI for Christopher Steele.
Did Ohr ‘personally and substantially’ participate in a particular matter in which his spouse had a ‘financial interest’ while he worked for the Justice Department?
This timing and number of interviews suggest the third unnamed agent had worked with Strzok and Page to devise a way to obtain intel from Christopher Steele after the FBI officially dismissed him as a source.
This meeting raises serious questions concerning whether Christopher Steele shared information from his ‘dossier’ with Bruce Ohr, prompting the FBI to launch Crossfire Hurricane.
Notes Bruce Ohr took during a November 2016 meeting with former FBI employees Peter Strzok and Lisa Page strongly suggest the couple helped devise the work-around.
Federal judge Amit P. Mehta rejected the government’s claim that responding to BuzzFeed’s discovery request ‘would compromise sensitive law enforcement interests.’
Would you do everything you could to determine whether you could trust a source who lied to you before relying on him to treat a U.S. citizen guilty of treason?
If James Comey, who signed the FISA application, couldn’t figure out who funded the dossier, how could a judge?
Newly released documents confirm House and Senate investigators’ claims that the Department of Justice and FBI used materially false and misleading information to secure wiretaps on Carter Page.
Yesterday’s joint hearing in front of the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees was the first public hearing Congress held with the official who launched the Russia probe two years ago.
New facts indicate Obama administration officials and career FBI and DOJ employees misled the FISA court in more ways than previous thought.
- The Public Reckoning Over Russiagate Will Not Be TelevisedThere will be no public mea culpa from the media for twcontinue reading >
- The Electoral College Still Makes Sense Because We’re Not A DemocracyWhat appears to deprive the populace of its power to decontinue reading >
- Black Lives Matter Founder: ‘The Clintons Use Black People For Votes’Black Lives Matter co-founder Alicia Garza says Hillarycontinue reading >