What we in the US are seeing now, and have ever since Donald Trump was elected, is an attempt by Democrats to weaponize the legal system to further a nakedly political agenda.
With the nation’s widest-ranging so-called ‘red-flag’ law, Newsom is demonstrating he’s more interested in settling political scores and pursuing far-left ideologies than actually governing.
“But people in China didn’t ask me about, you know, people owning AR-15s and mowing each other down in a mall,” Kerr said.
Thirty years into the national debate over semi-automatic rifles and ammunition magazines designed for defensive purposes, the only thing that has changed is the openness with which Democrats demonstrate their determination to prohibit the private ownership of firearms.
There are no two ways about it. As long as there is a background check system for gun purchases, Democrats will try to transform it into a firearm registry they can use to confiscate guns.
All top 10 Democrat presidential candidates advocate banning the most popular rifles and ammunition magazines in America. Five don’t want to wait for their current owners to die.
During the third round of Democratic presidential debates, Beto O’Rourke said if he is elected president the government would ‘take your AR-15s.’ He said the opposite less than two years ago.
Creeping government control is nothing new, but the DOJ’s recent disregard for the Second and Fourth Amendments shows old protections against abuses of power will wear thin without public vigilance.
These are the changes Republicans should make to federal gun laws, once they again hold the White House and both houses of Congress.
Should women be permitted to protect their own bodies? Or should they be forced to passively endure an attack until an authorized protector from the government can ride to their rescue?
It’s not only to prevent a Democrat landslide in 2020. It’s because Democrats will settle for nothing less than gun confiscation.
‘I got the gun for that purpose, but I never thought I would really have to use it,’ said a women who shot at the men who tried to rob her at 2:30 a.m Tuesday morning.
Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse bases his brief on an argument that the Supreme Court must change because the public will not like the court’s decisions.
Gun rights defenders are willing to genuinely compromise. But gun control advocates do not negotiate in good faith, creating bad policy with no logical end.
In the 1970s, the NRA changed its mission. If the NRA wants to be as powerful as Democrats claim it is, it’s going to have to change again.
The habitually dishonest Bill Clinton is mischaracterizing his ‘ban’ to help Democrats impose one with far more severe consequences.
An off-duty firefighter carrying his own concealed weapon held the armed suspect at gunpoint until police arrived.
If gun control advocates are really worried about fatality numbers, restrictive firearm policies are not the place to start.
Do you feel comfortable giving up a cornerstone of our republic for a safety dependent upon enforcement by a government that has failed at this before?
New Zealand’s government wants you to know that their first pass at gun confiscation was a great success, but a look at the facts may tell you otherwise.
- Schiff’s Committee Published Name Of Alleged Whistleblower Last WeekA transcript published by Schiff's committee included tcontinue reading >
- 5 Reasons A Senate Trial Would Be A Nightmare For DemocratsIf impeachment occurs and a Senate trial happens, the Gcontinue reading >
- What’s ‘Incredibly Damaging To The Gospel,’ Joshua Harris, Are Your Lies About ItIt seems to me that if Christians are serious about avocontinue reading >