Erielle Davidson is a Federalist contributor and an economic research assistant at the Hoover Institution. Davidson joins Mary Katharine Ham Read Full Article >
There is a strong case to be made that in nearly every way, save rhetoric, Donald Trump has been tougher on Russia than Barack Obama.
The latest salvo in the Russia Collusion Saga comes not from Robert Mueller’s indictment of 13 Russians, but from Obama loyalist John Brennan.
In a series of tweets, a top Facebook executive said the ‘Russians stole the 2016 election away from Hillary Clinton’ narrative is bogus.
The federal grand jury found no indication the illegal Russian activity altered the outcome of the election.
The Trump dossier allegations came from unnamed Russian sources — not Christopher Steele or other known informants. That’s a big problem.
Democrats and media are trying to deflect from the House memo by saying the Russia investigation really started in July 2016. That argument doesn’t work in their favor.
Her campaign is linked to at least three separate pieces of information fed to the FBI, including the dossier the FBI used as a pretext to spy on a Trump campaign associate.
Two explosive stories about the FBI’s handling of the probe into Russia and the Trump campaign were downplayed by a suddenly incurious press corps.
The Russia and FBI probes lure political partisans with the prospect of winning political battles by making an end run around ordinary politics.
There has been no indication that the Trump administration’s policies are influenced by Russian preferences. There are plenty, however, that President Obama’s policies were.
Here are some of the most shocking bombshells outlined in the memo, which summarizes information compiled by congressional Republicans.
Mollie Hemingway and Sean Davis discuss the last 18 months of collusion stories, Russian interference, leaks, and FBI investigations.
Julia Ioffe, staff writer at the Atlantic, joins the Federalist Radio Hour to discuss Putin’s hubris and the 2016 election interference.
Upping the ante in Syria would be politically disastrous for the president, and more important, it would damage America’s national security. Here’s why.
Are Republicans overplaying the memo? It’s entirely possible. But there is still no legal or ethical reason for the American people not to see it.
People and organizations that Americans trust for information have a consistent pattern of brazenly running cover for the Democrat Party.
- Dana Loesch: Here’s The Real Story Of What Happened At CNN’s Garbage Town HallAs Loesch and her security detail walked toward the stacontinue reading >
- Watch CNN’s Scripted Anti-Gun Town Hall Go Completely Off The RailsCNN's Jake Tapper intervened to protect a Democrat senacontinue reading >
- 6 Reasons Your Right-Wing Friend Isn’t Coming To Your Side On Gun ControlThere are several reasons Second Amendment advocates arcontinue reading >