Sixth Circuit Abortion Case Illustrates Leftist Judges’ Disdain For Laws And Precedent
The case shows the judiciary is just as fractured as the rest of America, and leftist judges are defiantly ignoring Supreme Court and circuit precedent.
Yes, The Senate Can Convict Trump After He’s Left Office, But Would That Be Prudent?
Like William W. Belknap, Trump was impeached while in office and will be tried when out of it. If a conviction is prudent will be for the Senate to decide.
Why It Would Be Ridiculous For Amy Coney Barrett To Recuse From Election Cases
The notion that Barrett must recuse herself or ‘categorically sit on the sidelines until the President who nominated [her] has left office’ is entirely antithetical to precedent.
No, Amy Coney Barrett’s Confirmation Won’t Necessarily End Roe v. Wade
A close look at Amy Coney Barrett’s legal writings indicates deep respect for the precedent set by landmark Supreme Court cases, including Roe v. Wade.
America’s Reign Of Judges Has Left Us With An Unrecognizable Constitution
Judges who can find no support in law for the outcome they want resort to their own personal sense of morality to achieve their desired result.
House Republicans Pledge To Appeal Judge’s Dismissal Of Proxy Voting Case
“Yesterday’s decision will not deter us from continuing to work to protect the voice and representation of the American people,” Kevin McCarthy said.
Why Josh Hawley’s New Supreme Court Litmus Test Is False Advertising
Sen. Josh Hawley’s pledge to vote only for nominees who have objected to Roe v. Wade would mean a vote against Clarence Thomas, and in favor of David Souter, Anthony Kennedy, and Sandra Day O’Connor.
Justice Kavanaugh Suggests He Might Be Willing To Overturn Roe v. Wade
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh argued that the principle of stare decisis has never required the court to uphold ‘erroneous precedents.’
Chief Justice Roberts Is Right: An Unelected Official Should Not Cast Tie-Breaking Votes
Roberts’ unwillingness to interfere in the proceedings of the trial will undoubtedly infuriate the left, but despite the hysteria, he’s absolutely correct.
Yes, The Supreme Court Should Overturn Precedent Sometimes
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas doesn’t want to set fire to the rule of law. He simply wants to let the Constitution, the real Constitution, once again be what it claims to be — the supreme law of the land.
Why I Won’t Stop Asking Judicial Nominees If They Will Follow The Constitution
All too often, lower courts have used a bad legal doctrine to stop states and local governments from protecting the unborn, even when Supreme Court case law would allow it.
Confirming Kavanaugh Will Not Fix The Problem Of Judicial Supremacy
Even if Brett Kavanaugh turns out to be a tremendous originalist justice, the courts still represent a major threat to the republic.
No, Marbury V. Madison Did Not Say The Supreme Court Gets Final Say On Constitutionality
Many today hold the distorted view that Marbury v. Madison affirmed the Supreme Court as the most powerful branch in determining the constitutionality of a government action.
Does Gorsuch’s Respect For Precedent Mean He Will Never Strike Roe?
Should pro-lifers who voted for the president because he promised to nominate a judge who would overturn Roe worry it won’t happen?
During His Hearings, Neil Gorsuch Answered Tough Questions With Ease
In the first two days of the Supreme Court confirmation hearings, senators pressed nominee Neil Gorsuch on a variety of issues that may be before the court, from antitrust to campaign finance.
The Whitmer Kidnapping Case Reveals The FBI’s New Counterterrorism Target Is YouWhat’s interesting about the revelations from this wecontinue reading >- Johns Hopkins Study Found Zero COVID Deaths Among Healthy KidsJohns Hopkins researcher Dr. Marty Makary says 'a tremecontinue reading >
- Anthony Fauci Champions The Forever PandemicDr. Anthony Fauci welcomed back mask mandates regardlescontinue reading >
