President Joe Biden’s selection of Merrick Garland and Vanita Gupta shows how insidious and unserious his calls for unity are.
Judge Merrick Garland, Biden’s nominee for attorney general, dodged a question about his opinion on biological males playing in female sports, saying it’s a “very difficult societal question.”
Hearings for president Joe Biden’s attorney general nominee, former federal Judge Merrick Garland, will launch Monday. He has some conflicts of interest.
Big tech’s election interference to propel Biden in 2020 appears it will pay off, as he considers tech-friendly lawyers to lead the DOJ antitrust division.
While many corporate media publications labeled Garland a ‘moderate,’ The New York Times aligned him in 2016 politically and ideologically left of SCOTUS Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer.
Had Democrats given Trump’s judicial nominees due respect and consideration, they could have had more influence over Barrett’s nomination process.
Romney says his highest duty is to the Constitution. Now is the time to prove it.
Merrick Garland was nominated to the Supreme Court in 2016 after Justice Antonin Scalia died, opening a seat on the bench in the middle of an election year.
Ginsburg’s advice against such schemes was sound, but her liberal fans will stop at nothing should they get the chance to change the Supreme Court.
The idea of an executive branch or SCOTUS nominee being confirmed by a Senate controlled by the opposing party may very well be dead.
Brett Kavanaugh takes his seat amid debates about the Supreme Court’s ‘legitimacy,’ with substantial portions of the population thinking he’s a rapist.
Whatever happens to the Brett Kavanaugh, Democrats have normalized another illiberal position in their pretend crusade to save America from Donald Trump.
If judges are a vindication of Trump, are they also a vindication of Mitch McConnell? And if so, does a good Supreme Court really compensate for a lousy Congress?
Democrats are trying to use Mitch McConnell’s 2016 political maneuvering against him, saying that the Senate should halt the nomination process until after the election.
Our discourse is full of rhetorical terms used to frighten or cajole the public in a given direction. But these words don’t mean what you think they mean.
It looks like Senate Democrats will block the nomination of Neil Gorsuch. It also means the end of the filibuster. Which is a shame.
They should follow the precedent Harry Reid set in 2013, and confirm Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch with 51 votes instead of 60.
Senate Republicans can confirm President Trump’s Supreme Court nominees without using the filibuster-killing nuclear option. Here’s how.
Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network, joins Federalist Radio to discuss the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch.
The Supreme Court was specifically designed to avoid almost every idea term-limit advocates think bolsters their arguments.
- I Haven’t Used Amazon For Almost 3 Months And I Don’t Miss It One BitI’ve been an Amazon user for about 15 years, and an acontinue reading >
- The Cancellation Of Dr. Seuss Should Disturb You, Because You’re NextAmerica is entering its very own Mao-like Cultural Revocontinue reading >
- Jordan Peterson Was A Victim Of Vicious Critics — And He Still IsJordan Peterson is back, and already the left has theircontinue reading >