The media behavior in the wake of this press conference was arguably something new, a sort of grotesque watermark of the media’s coverage of the Trump administration thus far.
Democrats and others on the Left have been responding to President Trump about as rationally as a band of redneck drivers with a collective short fuse.
An analysis shows just how reluctant the media were to jump on the scandalous story, even after Loretta Lynch publicly confirmed a private meeting with the husband of the high-profile woman being investigated.
Like ‘Trump TV,’ ‘West Wing Week’ clips were made to look like real news, but unlike Trump’s version, national newscasts actually used them as real news.
A batch of documents released by the Department of Justice reveal how reluctant reporters were to write about Loretta Lynch’s secret meeting with Bill Clinton while his wife was under federal investigation.
The press is constantly saying this president is losing credibility without recognizing it is in the exact same predicament.
If you didn’t read both articles, you could do what the Resistance did, and use different articles as ‘evidence’ that The Federalist supports whatever Trump does.
The idea that Russia orchestrated the Trump administration’s decision to end the CIA’s funding of jihadists is totally corrupt and offensive.
How out of touch are newsrooms that they thought Mike Pence’s position was Sharia-like, as opposed to what it turns out to be: completely normal?
Politics plays a role, but it’s smaller than it’s made out to be. Politics just easily becomes the scapegoat because ESPN is so boring when a game isn’t on.
Taking responsibility for just one of the many flawed stories CNN has been pushing is nowhere near sufficient a response to the institutional problems plaguing the media outlet.
Maybe the summer’s best sandwich produces a substantial carbon footprint—but I’m pretty sure we need food to live. Print magazines? Not so much.
It’s likely that most Americans have little recollection of where they were or what they were doing when they learned about Steve Scalise and the others who had been wounded. Why?
In the week after each shooting incident, newspapers nationwide ran more than twice as many articles mentioning Rep. Gabrielle Giffords as they have Rep. Steve Scalise, according to Lexis Nexis’s news database.
Did the same media that condemned Republicans for allegedly inspiring the Gabby Giffords shooting condemn today’s hysterical anti-Trump climate? Of course not.
In its first editorial following Wednesday’s attempted massacre of Republican lawmakers, the New York Times editorial board decided to peddle blatant lies about the nation’s gun laws.
A network that once strove to be centrist is now openly antagonistic. It will run with the thinnest of scoops for hours to make their case against President Trump.
In the wake of the terrorist attack in London that killed seven people and injured at least 48 others, some say it appears that CNN might have staged a fake protest.
That’s right, not even President Trump’s daughter-in-law is safe from media hit pieces.
- Donald Trump Needs To Not Be President YesterdayWe're done with the 'take what we can get' phase of Doncontinue reading >
- Trump Spoke Truth About ‘Both Sides’ In Charlottesville, And The Media Lost Their MindsThe media behavior in the wake of this press conferencecontinue reading >
- The ‘Peanuts’ Football Trick Explains Why Conservatives Keep Quiet About White SupremacyIt shouldn’t come as a surprise when those who are incontinue reading >