What accounts for the New York Times’ change from a dark presentation of absentee voting to a decidedly rosy one? The 2020 election, it appears.
When it comes to leftists protecting their own from accountability, it appears that only the strictest of scrutiny will do.
The efforts of state legislatures to enact new voting protections are in jeopardy if the Supreme Court fails to overturn the latest Ninth Circuit decision.
The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn’t the outcome they wanted. That did not happen after Nov. 3.
Time magazine’s article intones the ‘Trump is crazy’ mantra over his claims of a ‘rigged’ election while telling anyone who reads it how powerful people conspired to rig the 2020 election.
Between his two major companies, Amazon and the Washington Post, Jeff Bezos does not hold consistent views on mail-in voting.
If the state senator was in the field working, she certainly was not ‘indefinitely confined’ under the meaning and intent of state statute. So, did she break the law? How many others did?
I suppose it’s the prerogative of opinion writers to twist the facts to defend or advance their preferred narratives, but that’s not what fact-checkers are supposed to do.
Texas argues that the case ‘presents constitutional questions of immense national consequences,’ namely that the 2020 election suffered from serious constitutional irregularities.
Mail-in voting increases fraud and error rates to within election-winning margins, as well as the ability to manipulate election outcomes by contesting ballots.
This is an incredibly dangerous moment for the country and may be a pivotal point in the future of America’s democratic republic. Did we just cross the Rubicon?
Too many irregularities, too many reports of fraud, and too much uncertainty about mass mail-in voting have created a crisis of confidence.
The Pennsylvania Department of State did not respond to The Federalist’s multiple requests for comment, leaving important questions left unanswered, including these.
Mail ballots from Pennsylvania voters who had failed to provide required ID by a Monday deadline will be invalid, rules appellate court.
The Supreme Court will likely weigh in on Pennsylvania’s handling of mail-in ballots, and notwithstanding the pundits’ claims to the contrary, serious constitutional issues are at stake.
How Democrats continue to purposefully destroy public trust in fair, free elections, and the Union itself.
With nearly all the votes counted, President Donald Trump leads former Vice President Joe Biden in North Carolina by just under 75,000 votes.
“We have to ensure that every legal vote cast is counted in that every illegal vote cast is not counted.”
At issue was President Trump’s request for an order changing the way Pennsylvania absentee and mail-in ballots are being reviewed at the Philadelphia Convention Center.
A Republican poll challenger in Detroit signed an affidavit describing how he was kicked out of the voting center after witnessing ballots processed from ineligible voters.
- Virginia School Board Shuts Down Parent’s Objections To Racist IndoctrinationThe Fairfax County school board in suburban northern Vicontinue reading >
- Climate Of Fear? Colleagues Silent On CDC Retaliation Against ‘Superstar’ Scientist Who Tried To Prevent Vaccine ‘Pause’ DisasterThis climate of secrecy, retaliation, and intimidation continue reading >
- Frank Luntz Blames Tucker Carlson’s Criticism On Presidential AspirationsTucker Carlson is accused as eyeing the presidency by Fcontinue reading >