The government’s effort to withdraw the departure motion means Flynn can ask to withdraw his guilty plea. Now the prosecutors are changing their tune.
Sidney Powell exposed several more troubling details about the prosecution of Flynn, involving both the special counsel team and Flynn’s previous attorneys.
This dispute between the prosecution and the defendant is genuine and passionate and reflects their completely divergent views of the relevant facts.
If there is to be a just result in Flynn’s case, the court must address the question about Covington’s conflict of interest. Flynn shouldn’t be punished for mistakes that are attributable to his counsel rather than to him.
While this evidence provides his attorney a solid argument that the prosecution sought to push Michael Flynn to lie, that might not be enough to carry the day with Judge Sullivan.
If federal prosecutors made such a basic blunder concerning key evidence, what other mistakes lay buried in the undisclosed evidence?
A new Super PAC supporting Joe Biden is run by a lobbyist who is a registered foreign agent for the government of Azerbaijan.
With each new court filing, the public learns more about the government’s manipulation of Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn.
‘This was another case without a crime—brought by prosecutors who were willing to criminalize innocent behavior in furtherance of their own agenda,’ says Sidney Powell.
Was there a conflict of interest between Michael Flynn and his Covington and Burling attorneys who used to represent him? New facts unfold.
- After Stonewalling For Days, Sen. Chris Murphy Finally Admits He Secretly Met With Iranian Regime In Munich"If Trump isn’t going to talk to Iran, then someone scontinue reading >
- So God Made A BloombergAnd on the 8th day, God looked down on his planned paracontinue reading >
- The Student Debt You Willingly Took On Is Not My Problem To SolveApparently, the majority of Democratic presidential concontinue reading >