It’s very concerning that so many U.S. lawmakers and elected officials are now ignorant, or maybe just dismissive, of the constitutional rights of those they govern.
The left wants to prohibit choice in medicine, by forcing doctors and health-care providers with religious objections to perform abortions. Who’s really anti-choice?
A New York Times op-ed suggests allowing any religious liberty claims opens the door to spurious claims of religious liberty. This is utterly foolish.
Reed O’Connor’s ruling has emboldened the bigots, and hastened our descent into theocracy. At least, a reader could be forgiven for thinking as much.
Here’s yet another example of the Left refusing service to customers based on their beliefs, despite widely insisting the Right can’t do the same.
When we refuse to acquiesce in a state policy, we remind the world that not everyone agrees. In compelling speech on these subjects, the state forces that disagreement into the shadows.
To forbid people from articulating beliefs and peacefully acting consistently with those beliefs is, at its core, an attempt to forbid the beliefs themselves.
Fully implementing the Clinton policy could mean American taxpayers pay for more than half of all U.S. abortions. A single-payer system would convert Uncle Sam into the nation’s abortionist.
The current administration is illegally coercing health care providers into participating in abortions and denying their rights to bring lawsuits, testifiers said at a House forum on Friday.
If the Supreme Court were ever going to defend the Free Exercise Clause, this was the case to do it.
BuzzFeed is reneging on a contract because of pangs of conscience. Does this mean they’ll see the light on others who decline service for moral reasons?
- My Son’s Freshman Orientation At Virginia Tech Was Full Of Leftist PropagandaNow that I have witnessed college propaganda firsthand,continue reading >
- The New York Times Is Clueless About ConservativesA recently released transcript shows just how biased thcontinue reading >
- How Sarah Silverman Could Have Avoided Cancel CultureWhat makes this incident ridiculous is that Sarah Silvecontinue reading >