For vowing to only have two children, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have received an environmental award and called ‘role models.’
No one can actionably explain how paying to offset your carbon footprint actually counters the alleged extreme harm caused by everyday life.
If you’re interested in being green while also being fruitful and multiplying, and reversing our record low birth rate, here’s a list that isn’t anti-family.
In the vast majority of cases, how many kids you have just won’t affect any environmental outcomes. Plus the study on which these articles were based is junk science.
Maybe the summer’s best sandwich produces a substantial carbon footprint—but I’m pretty sure we need food to live. Print magazines? Not so much.
Oh, the stories cars could tell about the foolish consequences of government overreach.
The only compelling reason to embrace the doomsdayers’ radical interpretation is that it pairs well with your aversion to sucking the snot of a toddler’s nose.
- Black Lives Matter Is Threatening An ‘Uprising’ Against ‘Racist’ Vaccine MandatesIt’s a rule in the media that vaccine hesitancy is wocontinue reading >
- Obama-Appointed Judge Wrongly Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Twitter In Hunter Biden Laptop CaseIn an attempt to obtain some semblance of justice, The continue reading >
- Bravo’s ‘Below Deck’ Flips The Script, Focuses On The Servers And Not The ServedI couldn't get through more than three episodes of Bravcontinue reading >