This isn’t your typical cheesy Christian film but, given the message, it’s likely to attract a niche audience that already knows the truth about abortion.
Should ERA win passage, the result would be a dramatically empowered federal government on issues it decides impact women. That’s a threat to women, not a protection.
Good abortion storylines should be judged by the degree to which they accurately reflect reality––politically inconvenient reality included.
About half of Americans are opposed to abortion, and more are disgusted by late-term and partial-birth abortions. Democrats should stop running radicals if they are serious about winning.
If ‘the line’ isn’t at birth, where does one draw it? Who can’t be killed? The Democrats are hiding from their own tacit endorsement of infanticide.
For the first time since 2009, Americans are now as likely to identify as pro-life as they are pro-choice, after a rash of radical abortion legislation.
The NIH lets this heinous practice, which lets Planned Parenthood profit richly from their abortion business, continue at taxpayers’ expense. It must end.
When motherhood isn’t celebrated and honored, but looked at as an inconvenience, women are wrongly pressured to deny integral parts of their being.
As states rush to legalize third-trimester abortions, consider how pro-abortion ideology results in a ripple effect of injustice and tragedy.
Seventy-seven percent of pro-choice Americans oppose removing medical care for a child who could survive outside the womb. Sixty-six percent oppose abortion in the third trimester.
The new national debate over the legality and morality of infanticide may have just unraveled what was left of the bodily autonomy argument.
There’s no reason why anyone should need an abortion minutes before giving birth, when all states have infant safe haven laws.
The idea that for the sake of the fittest, the weakest among us must be destroyed is not a new idea. And it’s the reality the left wants us to live under.
Legislatures in New York and Virginia are opening the door to killing healthy 9-month-old babies. And if that’s not scary enough, it could get even worse.
The removal of these standards is essentially allowing abortion-on-demand, even up until moments before birth.
In the event Roe gets overturned, it won’t be the win for abortion abolition that pro-lifers claim. We must strategize accordingly.
Turning the debate away from the reality of abortion to questions of whether pro-lifers are sufficiently consistent or charitable is just a diversion.
No amount of denial from pro-choicers can change the fact that many post-abortive mothers carry the grief of a severed parent-child bond with them.
Several years later, the effect of the Center for Medical Progress’s videos are still rippling through the legal and cultural debate on abortion.
- Obama’s Campaign Paid $972,000 To Law Firm That Secretly Paid Fusion GPS In 2016Obama's campaign organization has paid nearly a millioncontinue reading >
- Maggie Haberman Thinks It’s Weird For The White House To Play ‘Edelweiss’Perhaps Haberman believes ‘Edelweiss’ in the moderncontinue reading >
- The Collusion Dream Is Dead But The Conspiracy Lives OnOur political, intelligence, and media elites sold us continue reading >