West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin rejected the idea Senate Democrats would pack the court Monday should they take the upper chamber.
The Democratic Party’s policies and tactics since Trump’s 2016 nomination are, almost to a letter, right out of leftist Harvard professors’ litmus test for detecting assaults on democracy.
Democrats don’t have to publicly commit to a party goal of packing the Supreme Court. They’ve got a rich network of activist groups working hard on the issue behind closed doors.
Democrats are promising vengeance for Republicans using their electoral victories to fulfill promises to voters about courts. We shouldn’t ignore their threats.
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough proposed nominating 73-year-old former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the Supreme Court should Democrats take power.
The longtime Biden adviser is supporting a bill of dubious constitutionality which would enforce hard term limits on any new Justices.
Democratic Nominee Joe Biden said if elected, he will study “how to reform the court system” because it is “getting out of whack.”
If Democrats gain a 9-6 majority after packing the Supreme Court, there will be little hope of preventing the resulting judicial tyranny from undoing America.
Despite Biden’s rhetorical spin, the term court packing does not refer to the president’s or the Senate’s constitutional duty to appoint and confirm justices to fill existing vacancies.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Democrats would be “in the constitutional right” to increase the number of seats on the Supreme Court.
Joe Biden said voters ‘don’t deserve’ to know whether he will pack the Supreme Court if he and vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris are elected in just a few weeks.
Here’s how a progressive majority on the court could fundamentally alter the basic rights of American citizens in ways not seen in decades.
Whatever newsworthy event Democrats have caused is overshadowed by the fact that Republicans are attacking them for it.
“You’ll know my opinion on court packing when the election is over,” Joe Biden said.
The American people deserve to know what the United States would look like under the hypothetical presidencies of Kamala Harris or Mike Pence.
Increasing the number of justices on the Supreme Court to further your political agenda isn’t a new idea. That doesn’t mean it’s a good one.
“It’s important that the Supreme Court is able to resolve conflicts among other courts about what the federal law is,” Ginsburg said. “That’s why eight is not a good number.”
American voters have a right to know whether he’ll go along with his party’s scheme to pack the Supreme Court if Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed.
Continued escalation of the judicial wars will not end until Roe is overturned and abortion policy is handed back to the people and their representatives.
GOP House members filed a resolution on Tuesday to condemn Democrats’ plans to pack the Supreme Court if they can’t defeat President Trump’s next nominee fair and square.
- 5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election NormsSurely the journalist class should be intrigued by the continue reading >
- Don’t Drink Grey Goose Unless You’re A College DrunkContra your neighborhood hipster bar, there is no such continue reading >
- Kayleigh McEnany Just Destroyed Fox News’ John Roberts In A Single TweetAfter the contentious Thursday morning briefing, McEnancontinue reading >