After using a firearm in justified self-defense, even if you don’t shoot it, you may be facing significant legal troubles (and large associated financial costs).
The McCloskey case remains an important legal precedent as private property owners increasingly find themselves without police protection in the face of violence.
The fact that four justices who complained that the court needed to hear Second Amendment cases passed on 10 chances to do so tells us much about the court’s ‘swing vote.’
By all accounts of history, David Hogg is wrong. And his tweet is callous to the injustice faced by the people whom he claims to champion.
A large group of people assembled peaceably to air their grievances and to state that, unless something changes, our consent to be governed is being revoked.
Instances of defensive gun use save lives every day, but the stories get very little news coverage and the negative gun use instances are often covered by the national news media for days on end.
In light of the shooting in Texas, gun control activists are blaming gun access and conceal-carry laws for the rise in gun deaths in the United States.
Biden’s agenda to minimize access to guns for law-abiding citizens would have dramatically changed the outcome in Sunday’s tragic shooting.
Heller preemptively rejected the First Circuit’s notion that the right to keep and bear arms should be balanced against government’s claimed interest in banning guns and magazines.
What we in the US are seeing now, and have ever since Donald Trump was elected, is an attempt by Democrats to weaponize the legal system to further a nakedly political agenda.
With the nation’s widest-ranging so-called ‘red-flag’ law, Newsom is demonstrating he’s more interested in settling political scores and pursuing far-left ideologies than actually governing.
“But people in China didn’t ask me about, you know, people owning AR-15s and mowing each other down in a mall,” Kerr said.
Thirty years into the national debate over semi-automatic rifles and ammunition magazines designed for defensive purposes, the only thing that has changed is the openness with which Democrats demonstrate their determination to prohibit the private ownership of firearms.
All top 10 Democrat presidential candidates advocate banning the most popular rifles and ammunition magazines in America. Five don’t want to wait for their current owners to die.
Creeping government control is nothing new, but the DOJ’s recent disregard for the Second and Fourth Amendments shows old protections against abuses of power will wear thin without public vigilance.
These are the changes Republicans should make to federal gun laws, once they again hold the White House and both houses of Congress.
Should women be permitted to protect their own bodies? Or should they be forced to passively endure an attack until an authorized protector from the government can ride to their rescue?
It’s not only to prevent a Democrat landslide in 2020. It’s because Democrats will settle for nothing less than gun confiscation.
The media should stop using phrases like ‘mandatory gun buybacks.’ What Democrats propose is the first-ever national confiscation of guns.
‘I got the gun for that purpose, but I never thought I would really have to use it,’ said a women who shot at the men who tried to rob her at 2:30 a.m Tuesday morning.
- The Left Hates Amy Coney Barrett Because She Disproves All Their Lies About WomenHer very existence repudiates the left's binary thinkincontinue reading >
- New York Times’ Trump Tax Return ‘Bombshell’ Is A JokeIf this is the big pre-debate 'gotcha' that the Democracontinue reading >
- Mask Fanatics Have Officially Abandoned Science To Control Your LifeThis is our world in 2020: Not even the experts can keecontinue reading >