The people who think they’re being moderate by subjugating religious freedom to special-interest groups forget there’s no reasoning with or safety around a mob.
Indiana’s ‘fix’ to its religious-freedom law increases burdens on conscience rights its original religious-freedom law was designed to protect.
Whether you’re Christian, Muslim, atheist, gay, straight, or trans, the First Amendment was written for you.
The sorry religious liberty episode in Indiana shows how law often lurches from one extreme to the other.
America is hosting a war between ideological and cultural enemies. Religious freedom is losing, and big government is winning.
The coming days will show us that American Christians aren’t as numerous as the guide books tell us. They might not be as strong as some assume, either.
The Progressive ideology explains why the Left supported RFRA in 1993 but is so opposed to it now.
Pushing for gay rights will be easier if religious objectors can trust that the state will not be used to compel them to violate their deepest beliefs.
Indiana’s ‘fix’ to its religious-freedom law will actively force private business owners to violate their consciences.
Gay people agree that it’s good to discriminate against some sexual activity. They and Indiana’s Republican leaders just disagree about where to draw the line.
Indiana’s religious freedom law is almost identical to the federal law, and court precedent forbids these from being used to discriminate against anyone.
Not a single person who identifies as homosexual has been harmed by the federal or dozens of state religious freedom acts.
Considering the ineffectiveness and cowardice of Republicans so far, religious liberty advocates might be better off without them.
Mike Pence faces a situation similar to what made Scott Walker a national figure. But the religious freedom battle thrust upon Pence matters far, far more.
There are lots of other people in the world who think they should be able to impose their values on others.
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA, isn’t some awful license to discriminate. It’s a balancing test that courts have to weigh based on facts.
Ever notice how liberals always freak out about what might happen as a result of things like religious freedom laws, when the opposite is actually happening?
Progressives shouldn’t join anti-Muslim activists in asserting wild outcomes from Indiana’s new religious freedom law.
My generation willfully ignores the real debate about gay rights and religious freedom because we want halos without sacrifice.
- How A Russian’s Grocery Store Trip In 1989 Exposed The Lie Of SocialismThe fall of the Berlin Wall was indeed a watershed in tcontinue reading >
- Nadler Cancels Judiciary Hearing On FISA Reform, Avoids Bipartisan AmendmentsDemocratic Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Jecontinue reading >
- Everything You Think You Know About Cuba Is A LieHere is the side of socialist Cuba we saw that the Amercontinue reading >