Embryo adoption allows children who otherwise would not be born to become part of a chosen, loving, permanent adopting family.
The ultimate solution to the problem is not ‘embryo adoption.’ The solution is never creating surplus embryos to begin with. No human being should be in storage.
When a couple pursues IVF treatment, creates embryos, then gets divorced, should those embryos be destroyed? Or do they have a right to life?
The legal process, which fails to recognize embryos as developing human beings with distinct DNA, has not caught up with modern science.
The recent malfunctions at two major fertility clinics expose more than just the technical failures of the assisted reproductive technologies industry.
As long as the business of creating surplus embryos remains unregulated in the United States, donating and adopting embryonic children increases the demand for it.
Our beliefs about ourselves and personal identity over time reveal that we already acknowledge the unborn are persons. We just haven’t reflected on the implications.
Science confirms that human life begins at conception, even if the pro-choice movement tends to look upon this as if it were some kind of witchcraft chant.
Sofia Vergara doesn’t want embryos she created with Nick Loeb to be born, but Loeb says they’re alive and he wants to parent them.
No child should need an org-chart to explain her artificially constructed, experimental family.
- Can You Spot The Difference Between These Two Insurrection Photos?Despite the media's disparate treatment, the most recencontinue reading >
- After National School Boards Association Waged War On Parents, Pennsylvania Chapter WithdrawsThe Pennsylvania School Boards Association voted unanimcontinue reading >
- Transhumanists Gather In Spain To Plan Global TransformationTransVision 2021 saw technologists push radical visionscontinue reading >