What we see in this report is a fear of a truth being revealed: That all of the LGBT lobby’s victories are hollow if the Supreme Court functions the way it was meant.
Some 400 current and former Yale Law students said Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court represents an existential threat. That’s insane.
Those who believe the state is better than the market at allocating resources will have the same attitude toward the marketplace of ideas.
A restauranteur most certainly cannot refuse service to anyone she doesn’t like. Not in this country.
The First Amendment includes the right not to speak, but the California law takes that right away by forcing pro-lifers to tell women about abortion centers.
It would be more than a little ironic for conservatives to seek to defend the Constitution while ignoring it when convenient.
Liberals argue that it’s time to raise the mandate ‘tax’ to compel holdouts to participate. Once again, Obamacare’s imaginary tax becomes a penalty.
The real sham against women is the Supreme Court’s false promises of protection. Clearly, shoddy, substandard, and incompetent abortionists provide mere ‘access’ to abortion.
While the Supreme Court’s decision against Abercrombie & Fitch may have been right, it has nothing to do with religious freedom.
The Supreme Court should scrap its unsound Equal Protection case law and return to simpler principles.
Washington’s modern administrative state is nowhere to be found in the text of the Constitution by any fair reading of its original language.
- New York Times Kavanaugh Reporter Told Source What To SayYear-old texts contained in a Senate Judiciary Committecontinue reading >
- The Russian Spy Who Wasn’t? Defamation Case Accuses U.S., U.K. Intelligence Of Using Michael Flynn For Spygate HoaxSvetlana Lokhova pieced together an apparent coordinatecontinue reading >
- Here’s How Boris Johnson Gets The Brexit Deal The U.K. Really NeedsAlthough British Prime Minister Boris Johnson seems to continue reading >