The notion that Barrett must recuse herself or ‘categorically sit on the sidelines until the President who nominated [her] has left office’ is entirely antithetical to precedent.
A close look at Amy Coney Barrett’s legal writings indicates deep respect for the precedent set by landmark Supreme Court cases, including Roe v. Wade.
June Medical shows that 47 years after Roe, the court still can’t agree on the standards for state abortion limits. Five justices at the very least aren’t committed to abortion on demand.
Roberts’ infidelity to the Constitution took him straight to bed with a seductive abortion lobby that whispered sweet nothings into his ear about what women want. He listened, and now vulnerable women will pay the price.
In a rare move, a three-judge panel ordered the presiding judge in the criminal case against Flynn to respond to his attorney’s petition for a writ of mandamus.
Sullivan should not embark on any contempt proceeding against Michael Flynn. Doing so would be a misuse of his contempt power.
Overturning Wisconsin v. Yoder would have ramifications far beyond Amish schoolhouses, opening the door to increased regulation and government oversight of homeschooling and religious schools’ curricula.
All the left’s talk about Supreme Court legitimacy, stability, and precedent is an attempt to preserve their previous unconstitutional judicial power grabs — especially on abortion. Will Roberts fall for it?
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas doesn’t want to set fire to the rule of law. He simply wants to let the Constitution, the real Constitution, once again be what it claims to be — the supreme law of the land.
All too often, lower courts have used a bad legal doctrine to stop states and local governments from protecting the unborn, even when Supreme Court case law would allow it.
Even if Brett Kavanaugh turns out to be a tremendous originalist justice, the courts still represent a major threat to the republic.
Many today hold the distorted view that Marbury v. Madison affirmed the Supreme Court as the most powerful branch in determining the constitutionality of a government action.
From ‘pure applesauce’ to ‘interpretive jiggery-pokery,’ deceased Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s legal wit will be sorely missed.
Today’s feminists are adroit at manufacturing a successive series of mystical antagonists in order to advance their causes.
- In 8-1 SCOTUS Ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts Is The Only One To Side Against Christian Students Whose Free Speech Was TrampledChief Justice John Roberts was the only dissenter in thcontinue reading >
- 15 Insane Things In Democrats’ H.R. 1 Bill To Corrupt Elections ForeverHere are just some of the unconstitutional, absurd, nakcontinue reading >
- Demi Lovato Calls Gender Reveal Parties ‘Transphobic’Demi Lovato finds pink and blue offensive, saying she bcontinue reading >