Both President Trump and President Obama took action to prevent dramatic premium spikes due to Obamacare’s insurance mandates. Yet only Trump was accused of ‘sabotage.’
Overall, insurers could receive a windfall of $4 to $5 billion from the Alexander-Murray subsidies spigot. That’s plenty more than the ‘specific benefit’ to taxpayers.
Conservatives should reject the premise that Congress must immediately open the federal piggy bank to replenish the unconstitutional subsidies the Trump administration cut off.
Before you accept the supposed consensus amplified by a compliant media about chaos and disaster, consider whether the White House’s week was really one of failure or success.
With Republicans in charge of Congress and the White House, will they allow a massive Obamacare tax on health insurance plans to hit Americans next year?
Democrats are holding up an arguably too-generous health welfare bill literally to shield the wealthy and insurance companies. Republicans have responded by…negotiating with them.
While one could presume Tim Kaine is intentionally deceiving the public to cover up his sweet deal, he could be instead genuinely ignorant of how health insurance works.
On the two critical questions—will it lower insurance premiums, and will it generate a system that works for states?—a textual analysis of Graham-Cassidy yields significant doubts.
Health-care federalism would give states the chance to reduce the cost of health care with market-based reforms. Not all states would take it, but some would.
What is unique about health care is not fee-for-service, but third-party payment. Only in health care is someone else picking up the tab for our spending.
Insurance commissioners’ ignorance that the unconstitutional cost-sharing payments could disappear closely mimics banks’ assumptions leading up to the subprime mortgage disaster.
The health insurance market has not been truly free since 1945, when Congress passed the McCarran-Ferguson Act.
We can’t meet every health need because every single person in this world is deteriorating. Someone must make decision about when health care is worthwhile and when it is not.
Stan Brock and his army of volunteers march the country and do what the government is either unable or unwilling to do: improve Americans’ access to health care.
Pundit Tomi Lahren recently revealed she’s still on her parents’ health insurance. Her comments provide a perfect case study against Obamacare’s under-26 mandate, in two respects.
Twenty-somethings mooching off of their parents’ health insurance plan aren’t the reason Obamacare is bad.
These people were lied to repeatedly, made to bear the brunt of Obamacare’s costs and broken promises, and now denigrated for daring to point out they have been hurt.
The story of one North Carolina man’s ordeal with Obamacare shows how the federal health care law hurts average American families by denying care.
- Sex Scandals Reveal How The Left Uses Shame To Destroy MoralityShame, we are now told, is back in vogue, particularly continue reading >
- This Year’s Starbucks Christmas Cup Controversy Is The Most Fake YetThis year, the entirety of the evidence for this New Yocontinue reading >
- NFL Kneelers’ Biggest Problem Is That We’re All Bored With Their ProtestThe Left is inherently inclined to self-indulgent subjecontinue reading >