The government’s effort to withdraw the departure motion means Flynn can ask to withdraw his guilty plea. Now the prosecutors are changing their tune.
The government responded to Flynn’s motion to dismiss based on prosecutorial misconduct, but failed to address two of the retired general’s strongest arguments.
Sidney Powell exposed several more troubling details about the prosecution of Flynn, involving both the special counsel team and Flynn’s previous attorneys.
This dispute between the prosecution and the defendant is genuine and passionate and reflects their completely divergent views of the relevant facts.
While this evidence provides his attorney a solid argument that the prosecution sought to push Michael Flynn to lie, that might not be enough to carry the day with Judge Sullivan.
Two passages in Judge Emmet Sullivan’s decision, separated by scores of pages in the tedious 99-page opinion, make clear that the outcome was a forgone conclusion.
‘Far too many in the FBI and DOJ are willing to hide evidence, falsify documents and make up crimes to achieve their objectives.’
After having previously insisted there is no reason to delay Michael Flynn’s sentencing, the government has asked the judge to put both the briefing and the sentencing hearing on hold.
If federal prosecutors made such a basic blunder concerning key evidence, what other mistakes lay buried in the undisclosed evidence?
With each new court filing, the public learns more about the government’s manipulation of Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn.
We now know more of the strands of SpyGate that Sidney Powell has weaved together since taking over as Michael Flynn’s defense attorney a few short months ago.
Lawyer Sidney Powell’s bigger plan is to expose the breadth and depth of SpyGate and how flaying Michael Flynn lay at the heart of the soft coup attempt.
What should have been a quick hearing turned into a 45-minute preview of Sidney Powell’s plan to combat what she characterized as egregious government misconduct.
The question is whether Michael Flynn was affected by efforts to get Trump, and whether Judge Sullivan will keep him from reviewing the evidence that could prove prosecutorial misconduct.
Was there a conflict of interest between Michael Flynn and his Covington and Burling attorneys who used to represent him? New facts unfold.
Michael Flynn’s new attorney Sidney Powell suggested the special counsel may not have produced classified information relevant to Flynn’s case. Powell intends to obtain it.
What is Michael Flynn’s new ‘GREAT LAWYER, Sidney Powell’ up to? And what might it mean for Flynn and those seeking the truth about Spygate?
News just broke that Michael Flynn has hired vocal special counsel critic Sidney Powell to represent him. Here’s what it might mean.
For many, the criminal case against Flynn was never about Flynn; it was about our country abandoning the precept of equal justice under the law.
- Every Future ‘Bachelor’ Contestant Should Follow Madison’s Lead On Fantasy Suite SexAside from being a reasonable way to test 'Bachelor' Pecontinue reading >
- Did Obama’s DOJ Leak Michael Flynn’s Russia Phone Call To Set Him Up?Did the Department of Justice leak or arrange the leak continue reading >
- Don’t Be So Confident: Here’s How Bernie Sanders Could Win The ElectionSen. Bernie Sanders's rise, his supporters, and the natcontinue reading >