Instead of blaming the DOJ for the frustration of artists like Rihanna and Jagger, policymakers should consider revisiting the unrestrained corporate greed that brought about these restraints.
A federal court judge just rejected Richard Prince’s claim that his use of another artist’s work was so patently innovative, he shouldn’t have to go to trial for charges of infringement.
Our commerce and speech are often inseparably linked, such that the government’s attempt to limit one results in limiting the other.
Are creators entitled to the fruits of their hard work, imagination, and creativity? The cultural left for which Richard Prince is the poster boy says no.
Donald Trump would not let Steven Tyler drink Trump Vodka for free. Why should he expect to use Tyler’s music for free?
- CNN Whistleblower Reveals Network ‘Vendetta’ Against Trump, Obsession With ImpeachmentA whistleblower leaked a video in which CNN President Jcontinue reading >
- Democracy Dies In Darkness: Adam Schiff Just Banned A GOP Lawmaker From Attending Key Ukrainegate DepositionDemocrat Adam Schiff just banned a GOP lawmaker from a continue reading >
- Why Trump Is Absolutely Right To Get U.S. Troops Out Of SyriaMoving American troops from Syria would be perhaps the continue reading >