Instead of blaming the DOJ for the frustration of artists like Rihanna and Jagger, policymakers should consider revisiting the unrestrained corporate greed that brought about these restraints.
A federal court judge just rejected Richard Prince’s claim that his use of another artist’s work was so patently innovative, he shouldn’t have to go to trial for charges of infringement.
Our commerce and speech are often inseparably linked, such that the government’s attempt to limit one results in limiting the other.
Are creators entitled to the fruits of their hard work, imagination, and creativity? The cultural left for which Richard Prince is the poster boy says no.
Donald Trump would not let Steven Tyler drink Trump Vodka for free. Why should he expect to use Tyler’s music for free?
- Maggie Haberman Thinks It’s Weird For The White House To Play ‘Edelweiss’Perhaps Haberman believes ‘Edelweiss’ in the moderncontinue reading >
- The Collusion Dream Is Dead But The Conspiracy Lives OnOur political, intelligence, and media elites sold us continue reading >
- CNN Can’t Do The Mueller Report MathLook at this chyron from CNN last night. Notice anythincontinue reading >