Instead of blaming the DOJ for the frustration of artists like Rihanna and Jagger, policymakers should consider revisiting the unrestrained corporate greed that brought about these restraints.
A federal court judge just rejected Richard Prince’s claim that his use of another artist’s work was so patently innovative, he shouldn’t have to go to trial for charges of infringement.
Our commerce and speech are often inseparably linked, such that the government’s attempt to limit one results in limiting the other.
Are creators entitled to the fruits of their hard work, imagination, and creativity? The cultural left for which Richard Prince is the poster boy says no.
Donald Trump would not let Steven Tyler drink Trump Vodka for free. Why should he expect to use Tyler’s music for free?
- How Greg Gutfeld’s Success Exposes The Media’s Cultural BlindspotsThe relative invisibility of 'The Greg Gutfeld Show' incontinue reading >
- 5 Reasons Jon Stewart’s Rant About Congress Was Completely IgnorantNoting that lawmakers tweeted about never forgetting thcontinue reading >
- Media Claims Notwithstanding, Trump Is Favored To Be Re-ElectedNothing has turned out the way the Resistance had hopedcontinue reading >