Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas doesn’t want to set fire to the rule of law. He simply wants to let the Constitution, the real Constitution, once again be what it claims to be — the supreme law of the land.
What they were able to do to the Constitution implicitly through the courts, many progressives are now calling to be done externally at the expense of the judiciary’s independence.
In the feud between President Trump and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, both are wrong. Judges aren’t partisan hacks, but they do have different approaches to jurisprudence.
We are seeing federal judges repeatedly issue nationwide injunctions halting government operations that the judges deem politically incorrect.
Even if Brett Kavanaugh turns out to be a tremendous originalist justice, the courts still represent a major threat to the republic.
The Supreme Court’s ability to issue a binding opinion on any subject that no one else could overturn is inconsistent with the checks and balances the Framers crafted.
- Let’s Stop Pretending Every Impeachment Witness Is A Selfless HeroIt’s become clear that some witnesses in the impeachmcontinue reading >
- Vindman Just Admitted To Leaking To The Anti-Trump WhistleblowerWhen pressed on who Vindman spoke with about the call, continue reading >
- Vindman Exaggerated His Resume In Prepared Congressional StatementVindman claimed to be the “principal advisor to the Ncontinue reading >