While his opponent hopes to bring her focus on social justice to the state Supreme Court, Justice Dan Kelly wishes to ‘assiduously patrol the borders between the branches.’
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas doesn’t want to set fire to the rule of law. He simply wants to let the Constitution, the real Constitution, once again be what it claims to be — the supreme law of the land.
What they were able to do to the Constitution implicitly through the courts, many progressives are now calling to be done externally at the expense of the judiciary’s independence.
In the feud between President Trump and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, both are wrong. Judges aren’t partisan hacks, but they do have different approaches to jurisprudence.
We are seeing federal judges repeatedly issue nationwide injunctions halting government operations that the judges deem politically incorrect.
Even if Brett Kavanaugh turns out to be a tremendous originalist justice, the courts still represent a major threat to the republic.
The Supreme Court’s ability to issue a binding opinion on any subject that no one else could overturn is inconsistent with the checks and balances the Framers crafted.
- CDC: After 10-Week Decline In COVID-19 Deaths, It May Soon No Longer Be An EpidemicWhile policymakers toy with the idea of a second shutdocontinue reading >
- Tucker Carlson On The Federalist Radio Hour: ‘You Shouldn’t Wait To Say What You Think Is True’No. 1 cable news talk show host Tucker Carlson joined Ccontinue reading >
- NYC Councilwoman Freaks Out Over White Man Holding Black Child: ‘It Hurts People’'This is how black and indigenous people of color see tcontinue reading >