These requirements would undermine the bill’s supposed goal of ‘state flexibility,’ and could lead to a regime more onerous and expensive than Obamacare itself.
If the only state-based insurance reform plan proposed to date violates Graham-Cassidy, then how much ‘flexibility’ does the legislation really provide?
Press reports suggest the administration is preparing to revoke Obama administration regulations sharply limiting the sale of short-term health insurance plans.
His lack of expertise and basic knowledge has been exposed by many outlets, but a question remains: why is Jimmy Kimmel the face of Democratic health care policy?
On the two critical questions—will it lower insurance premiums, and will it generate a system that works for states?—a textual analysis of Graham-Cassidy yields significant doubts.
Lost in the political drama is why health-care reform legislation is so difficult to pass in the first place and why the solution to the problem, which is exceedingly simple, is being ignored.
Emily Jashinsky, commentary writer at the Washington Examiner, talks Emmys, campus crazies, and health care on the Federalist Radio Hour.
Which states will end up the proverbial winners and losers under the Graham-Cassidy bill? The answer is simple: Nope.
The Graham-Cassidy proposal does not break ‘The Jimmy Kimmel Test.’ If anything, it more fairly divvies up federal dollars to the states.
Health-care federalism would give states the chance to reduce the cost of health care with market-based reforms. Not all states would take it, but some would.
The Senate’s 52 Republicans have multiple options open to keep the Obamacare repeal process alive after September 30. The only question is whether they have the political will to do so.
- The GOP’s Four-Point Defense Of Trump Is DevastatingRep. Jim Jordan and other GOP House members presented fcontinue reading >
- The Person Of The Year Is Not Greta Thunberg. It’s The Hong Kong ProtesterIn defiance of the most powerful authoritarian regime icontinue reading >
- FBI Lied To Congress About Fake ‘Defensive’ Briefing Of Trump Campaign In 2016During the Senate Judiciary hearings with Michael Horowcontinue reading >