A New York Times op-ed suggests allowing any religious liberty claims opens the door to spurious claims of religious liberty. This is utterly foolish.
If Peterson can be tripped up by the most obvious and easily refuted rejections of his non-compelled-speech program, the very thing that propelled his rise to fame, what good is he?
The ACLU characterizes the core issue in Masterpiece as not free speech or the free exercise of religion, but discrimination comparable to racial division in the 1960s.
If ‘each and every individual’ has the right to artistic self-determination, why is the ACLU spearheading efforts to destroy people who exercise those rights?
- YouTube Bans Sen. Ron Johnson For Discussing Early Treatment Of COVID-19YouTube's position is that content on the site must parcontinue reading >
- The Media Didn’t ‘Get It Wrong’ On Lafayette Park, They Lied To America — And They’re Still LyingOn June 1, 2020 and afterward, corporate media didn't scontinue reading >
- What Happens When Hedge Funds Buy Up NeighborhoodsA real estate firm estimates 'that in many of the natiocontinue reading >