A New York Times op-ed suggests allowing any religious liberty claims opens the door to spurious claims of religious liberty. This is utterly foolish.
If Peterson can be tripped up by the most obvious and easily refuted rejections of his non-compelled-speech program, the very thing that propelled his rise to fame, what good is he?
The ACLU characterizes the core issue in Masterpiece as not free speech or the free exercise of religion, but discrimination comparable to racial division in the 1960s.
If ‘each and every individual’ has the right to artistic self-determination, why is the ACLU spearheading efforts to destroy people who exercise those rights?
- IG Report Confirms Schiff FISA Memo Media Praised Was Riddled With LiesNearly two years later, the inspector general's report continue reading >
- How Joe Biden Gets Away With Calling A Voter A Fat, Dumb, LiarTrump insults a lot of people, and D.C. elites are horrcontinue reading >
- Why Trump’s Gains With Black Voters Could Swing The 2020 ElectionHow much support can Trump actually gain in 2020? It’continue reading >