A New York Times op-ed suggests allowing any religious liberty claims opens the door to spurious claims of religious liberty. This is utterly foolish.
If Peterson can be tripped up by the most obvious and easily refuted rejections of his non-compelled-speech program, the very thing that propelled his rise to fame, what good is he?
The ACLU characterizes the core issue in Masterpiece as not free speech or the free exercise of religion, but discrimination comparable to racial division in the 1960s.
If ‘each and every individual’ has the right to artistic self-determination, why is the ACLU spearheading efforts to destroy people who exercise those rights?
- A Drug Cartel Just Defeated The Mexican Military In BattleMexico is in a state of collapse, and Americans need tocontinue reading >
- Adam Schiff Flip-Flopped On Whistleblower Testimony After Reports Of CoordinationHouse Democrats' top impeachment inquisitor abruptly chcontinue reading >
- 6 Crazy School District Responses To Parents Mad About LGBT Indoctrination Of PreschoolersAn Illinois school district's leaders heard from upset continue reading >