A New York Times op-ed suggests allowing any religious liberty claims opens the door to spurious claims of religious liberty. This is utterly foolish.
If Peterson can be tripped up by the most obvious and easily refuted rejections of his non-compelled-speech program, the very thing that propelled his rise to fame, what good is he?
The ACLU characterizes the core issue in Masterpiece as not free speech or the free exercise of religion, but discrimination comparable to racial division in the 1960s.
If ‘each and every individual’ has the right to artistic self-determination, why is the ACLU spearheading efforts to destroy people who exercise those rights?
- CDC: After 10-Week Decline In COVID-19 Deaths, It May Soon No Longer Be An EpidemicWhile policymakers toy with the idea of a second shutdocontinue reading >
- Tucker Carlson On The Federalist Radio Hour: ‘You Shouldn’t Wait To Say What You Think Is True’No. 1 cable news talk show host Tucker Carlson joined Ccontinue reading >
- NYC Councilwoman Freaks Out Over White Man Holding Black Child: ‘It Hurts People’'This is how black and indigenous people of color see tcontinue reading >