An Oregon newspaper included the race of a white man who was fatally shot by police in its coverage, then clarified it felt his race was important “in light of social unrest prompted by police shootings of Black people.”
“Recent shootings include Daunte Wright, who was killed by police in a Minneapolis suburb earlier this week, and two killings in Clark County in recent months,” the newspaper explained, nodding to the fact that those fatal shootings sparked rioting, looting, and other destruction.
Hours after it was published, however, The Oregonian deleted the paragraph and the tweet quoting it after the paper claimed the original statement was “poorly worded.”
“We included information in an earlier tweet about why we identified the victim’s race that was poorly worded. It was not intended to minimize what happened, only to provide context. We generally do not identify race in news stories but often do when reporting police shootings,” the newspaper’s clarification tweet stated.
We included information in an earlier tweet about why we identified the victim’s race that was poorly worded. It was not intended to minimize what happened, only to provide context. We generally do not identify race in news stories but often do when reporting police shootings.
— The Oregonian (@Oregonian) April 16, 2021
In the original story, The Oregonian reported that Portland police fatally shot a white male in his 30s on Friday morning after they received calls that someone at a public park had a gun. The man’s race, the newspaper claimed, was important because of the current social climate. The new paragraph instead states that “there have been several high profile fatal police shootings of Black men” recently but “the victim in this case was a white man in his 30s.”
Despite The Oregonian’s attempts to frame the story by clarifying the man’s race to avoid “social unrest,” crowds still gathered at the park on Friday to condemn the deadly shooting. Their cries for “justice now,” according to The Oregonian, were met with “a dozen officers who had donned riot gear.”
“Police told protesters over a loudspeaker to leave the area or risk arrest,” The Oregonian reported.
The race characterization by the newspaper also received backlash on social media by people who quickly saw the irony in the statement.
The Oregonian is noting the race of the man who was shot in Portland because people won’t care enough to riot unless the victim is black and can use it to forward a political agenda. How instructive. pic.twitter.com/LBSbIRygs2
— Jason Rantz on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) April 16, 2021
"No need to riot on this one, he was white" – this newspaper, basically https://t.co/VuVTsQRmf6
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) April 16, 2021
"The police killed a man, he was white so you don't need to come and riot" is a sane and healthy message coming from our media. https://t.co/Fsvfmzn49F
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) April 16, 2021
He was white, so no need to riot.
The @Oregonian, Portland’s paper of record. https://t.co/9dP36uPaMi pic.twitter.com/7PTOxMomQw
— Andy Ngô 🏳️🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) April 16, 2021