Skip to content
Breaking News Alert Human Trafficking Czar Ignores Democrat-Invited Human Trafficking Over U.S. Border

Watch Hillary Praise Planned Parenthood’s Eugenicist Founder Margaret Sanger

Planned Parenthood is a big fan of butchering babies so it can sell their body parts for cash, and Hillary Clinton is a big fan of Planned Parenthood.


Planned Parenthood is a big fan of butchering babies so it can sell their body parts for profit, and Hillary Clinton is a big fan of Planned Parenthood.

Earlier today, the Center for Medical Progress released shocking video of Planned Parenthood’s top medical director bragging about how she performs abortions so she can later later sell the body parts for cash.

It’s enough to make any normal person want to vomit. Hillary Clinton is not that person. In fact, she’s a pretty big fan of Planned Parenthood, and the nation’s largest abortion provider is a pretty big fan of Hillary Clinton. Birds of a feather harvest unborn baby body parts together, as the old saying goes.

When Hillary Clinton announced her presidential candidacy earlier this year, Planned Parenthood welcomed her to the race with open arms. They even noted that throughout her career, Hillary scored a perfect 100 percent on all of Planned Parenthood’s congressional scorecards. Planned Parenthood’s press release praising Hillary does not mention whether the organization includes support for illegal trafficking of unborn baby organs on its annual scorecards.

As much as Planned Parenthood loves Hillary, Hillary’s an even bigger fan of Margaret Sanger, the racist eugenicist founder of the organization. Clinton specifically honored Sanger at a 2009 Planned Parenthood event in Houston.

“I admire Margaret Sanger enormously,” Clinton told the event’s attendees. “Her courage, her tenacity, her vision.”

“When I think about what [Sanger] did all those years ago in Brooklyn,” Clinton gushed. “I am really in awe of her. And there are a lot of lessons we that can learn from her life and the cause she launched and fought for and sacrificed so greatly.”

Margaret Sanger, for those who are unaware, was a vile racist and eugenicist who dedicated her life to ridding the world of poor black babies, who she deemed the “degenerate and defective.” She was a featured guest of the Ku Klux Klan and a huge proponent of the forced sterilization program of the Nazi regime in the 1930’s. Sanger pushed for birth control not because she believed it liberated women from the burdens of motherhood, but because she saw it as the best way to get minorities and the handicapped, whom she detested, to voluntarily stop breeding. And she was an outspoken proponent of the most vile type of eugenics imaginable:

Seemingly every new approach to the great problem of the human race must manifest its vitality by running the gauntlet of prejudice, ridicule and misinterpretation. Eugenists may remember that not many years ago this program for race regeneration was subjected to the cruel ridicule of stupidity and ignorance. Today Eugenics is suggested by the most diverse minds as the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems. The most intransigent and daring teachers and scientists have lent their support to this great biological interpretation of the human race. The war has emphasized its necessity.

You read that correctly. Hillary Clinton openly praised a woman who described the human race as a “problem,” characterized the opponents of eugenics as being riddled with “stupidity and ignorance,” and praised eugenics as the “most adequate and thorough” way to solve the nation’s “racial” problems.

“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it,” declared a woman who Hillary Clinton said she admired enormously.

Sanger, whose “courage” left Hillary Clinton in awe, was an open supporter of Nazi sterilization laws, going so far as to write an entire letter praising them and declaring that “the rights of the individual could be equally well safeguarded” by the Nazi regime:

Again, however, we must stress the fact that in a national program for human conservation institutional and voluntary sterilization are not enough; they do not reach those elements at large in the population whose children are a menace to the national health and well-being.

Reports in medical journals state that the indications laid down in the German law are being carefully observed. These are gongenital feeble-mindedness; schizophrenia, circular insanity; heredity epilepsy; hereditary chorea (Huntington’s)’ hereditary blindness or deafness; grave hereditary bodily deformity and chronic alcoholism.

Surely everyone will agree that the children of parents so afflicted are no contribution to the nation for even if they do not inherit these defects they are children of parents so handicapped that life will give them little, owing to their necessarily bad environment.

There are 1,700 special courts and 27 higher courts in Germany to review the cases certified for sterilization there. The rights of the individual could be equally well safeguarded here, but in no case should the rights of society, or which he or she is a member, be disregarded.

Hillary Clinton went out of her way to praise this woman, a woman who declared that blind and deaf people were “no contribution to the nation” and should therefore be forcibly sterilized so as not to breed. Hillary Clinton explicitly praised Margaret Sanger’s “cause” and “vision.”

In 1934, Margaret Sanger proposed a federal law that would regulate who could and could not reproduce babies. Here is an actual excerpt from the law she proposed:

Article 8. Feeble-minded persons, habitual congenital criminals, those afflicted with inheritable disease, and others found biologically unfit by authorities qualified judge should be sterilized or, in cases of doubt, should be so isolated as to prevent the perpetuation of their afflictions by breeding.

Why was that necessary? According to Sanger, the provision was meant to be a solution to “the problem of how to stop reproduction by those who are recognised as biologically unfit[.]”

Again, Hillary Clinton, the leading contender to be the next president of the United States, praised this woman and her life’s work: the forced elimination of the “biologically unfit.”

The Planned Parenthood of 2015 is the natural heir of the ideology of Margaret Sanger in 1934. Whereas its founder once praised the barbaric inhumanity practices of the Nazi regime, the organization today mimics its practices: killing perfectly healthy people and then passing around their bodily remains under the guise of “medical research.” The only difference is that while Sanger pushed the practice based on her distorted view of the perfectability of the human race, today’s Planned Parenthood does it for profit.

And Hillary Clinton, by all appearances, is totally fine with that.