The Supreme Court Is Not The Final Say On The Constitution
The judiciary’s rulings are not the supreme law of the land, even rulings from the Supreme Court. The judiciary is not the only or even final arbiter on the Constitution.
How Pro-Lifers Can Overcome The Courts Stacked Against Life
The pro-life movement seems to have no answer to courts allowing blue states to expand abortion and preventing red states from limiting it even in the smallest ways.
Now That The Supreme Court Isn’t Their Puppet, Liberals Want To Destroy It
What they were able to do to the Constitution implicitly through the courts, many progressives are now calling to be done externally at the expense of the judiciary’s independence.
Abolishing The Supreme Court Isn’t The Left’s Most Extreme Idea For Weaponizing Courts
Democrats embrace the basic tenet that judging is simply another form of politics. This embrace echoes the rise of the politicized life on the left.
Should Presidents And Legislatures Ignore Crazy Court Decisions? Alexander Hamilton Thinks So
When a president or legislature is faced with following either a court ruling they know has no constitutional basis or the actual Constitution, they should heed Hamilton’s advice.
Why You Shouldn’t Cheer Every Time Courts Do What You Want
How increasingly letting states and citizens sue to stop laws and regulations they don’t like, such as President Trump’s immigration order, can politicize courts and end self-government.
Why We Want Judicial Engagement, Not Judicial Restraint
If widely embraced, judicial engagement would give constitutional conservatives something to get genuinely excited about.
Republican Lawmakers Should Stop Enforcing Unconstitutional Supreme Court Decisions
Rather than accepting the Supreme Court’s usurpations as ‘law of the land,’ Republicans should restore the court’s coequal status with Congress and the presidency.
How To Judge Merrick Garland’s Fitness For The Supreme Court
To truly merit a place on the Supreme Court—whether for Merrick Garland or someone else—the next appointee must understand the constitutional power he or she exercises.
Supreme Court Says Pharmacists Must Dispense Abortifacients
If the Supreme Court were ever going to defend the Free Exercise Clause, this was the case to do it.
King v. Burwell versus Marbury v. Madison
Forget judicial review. After King v. Burwell, the Supreme Court is here to be a partisan rubber stamp.
Dear Lindsey Graham: Be A Man, Not A MemeDemocrats don’t need anything more to stack the courtcontinue reading >- Media Won’t Report That Tlaib And Omar’s Israel Trip Was Planned By A Pro-Terrorist GroupThe establishment press must be getting quite a crick icontinue reading >
- When Adults Like Caitlyn Jenner Pursue Transgender Parenting Fantasies, Children SufferThe best interest of children should be placed above ancontinue reading >
