President Trump’s passivity regarding the agencies’ arrogation of power over security clearances amounts to acquiescence to a change from constitutional to bureaucratic government.

Nearly all of the U.S foreign policy establishment is now aligned with the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party. That’s not surprising.

Because feeling better about one’s self by punishing others is an addictive pleasure, victories can never satiate those who wage identity politics as war.

Since Donald Trump and his teleprompter’s understanding do not penetrate beneath slogans, following him will generate deeper troubles.

President Obama’s attempt to protect Hillary Clinton’s willful law-breaking has changed our regime’s presumption that the public has a right to know into the opposite.

Americans as the world’s cops is okay with Donald Trump, so long as we are rent-a-cops.

The Cuban government rations to their people just one-third of the calories they need to live. President Obama’s Cuba policy will make the hunger worse.

The Obama administration is pinching the Kurds, who have been the United States’ most reliable anti-terrorism partner in the Middle East.

The conservative movement’s guard dogs aren’t barking against a real threat to the ideals they claim to promote.

The difference between Donald Trump and Barack Obama amounts only to whatever difference may exist between each emperor’s set of cronies.

Once its allies guard the Turkish border, Russia will be the unchallenged mistress of the Fertile Crescent, while the United States will have become irrelevant there.

The same factors that are destroying Europe are at work in the United States, but their downfall can once again be our opportunity to arise.

America’s leaders should take some lessons from Vladimir Putin on how to advance one’s own interests.

We should return to the debate formats of Lincoln’s day.

‘World Order’ reflects badly on Henry Kissinger and on the establishment that celebrates him.

Our current policy is not to interfere with the capacity of Russian or Chinese missiles to devastate the United States.

A Tea Party president’s foreign policy would markedly differ from that of a Progressive, Libertarian, or establishment candidate.

The next progressive president will further endanger Americans by supporting thugs, backstabbing friends, and using international crises to remake America.

Washington’s foolish approaches to the Islamic State will not destroy them or discourage others from following in their footsteps.

President Obama’s response to ISIS is another example of how our ruling class couples their illusions with whatever they find it convenient to do.