The content in this article is not suitable for children.
There is nothing more jarring than waking up to a Twitter feed littered with photos and footage of nude men and women prancing at pride parades all across North America.
Yet, that’s exactly what happened to many on Monday morning after nudists, furries, and other fetishists gathered in New York City, Seattle, and Toronto this weekend to celebrate sex under the LGBT banner. Children were not only present for these inappropriate displays but — in the case of a naked gathering in Wisconsin — actually participated.
One of the most egregious justifications for this behavior came from leftist tech bro Brian Krassenstein who claimed that Libs of TikTok shouldn’t tweet the offending videos because “millions of kids can now see this.”
Krassenstein suggested that “Seeing a man naked on a bike isn’t going to have much of an impact on any kid,” and posting the video was “arguably worse [than] riding a bike naked in front of a kid or two.”
He claimed that adults exposing themselves to children “certainly should be illegal.” Wrapped up with the assertion that indecent exposure to children doesn’t really matter was the claim that “there are much much worse things the average kid will see or hear online and offline in a typical week.”
Just because our society is oversaturated with sex doesn’t mean children should be exposed to it. Even the federal government acknowledges that many cases of child sexual exploitation begin when predators show children “suggestive images” and “nudity is introduced.”
It doesn’t take a genius to know that despite the sexual revolution’s sweeping failures, leftists are advancing their “liberating” (aka radical) ideas about sex by involving children.
“Sexualized childhood is the next frontier for the sexual revolution,” Federalist contributor Scott Yenor wrote in First Things in 2020. “It comes in the sheep’s clothing of pregnancy prevention and healthy lifestyles, but it is a wolf. It promises to disorder human sexual relations—and to undermine what remains of our marital and family ethic and subvert civilization itself.”
For decades, the left and their allies insisted that the LGBT agenda was not demonic or perverted but simply begged for open-mindedness and inclusion. Evidence of the demonic and perverted activity that plagues pride every year repeatedly undercuts this lie. Yet, the people who rule you, the institutions that employ you, and the brands that you buy wholeheartedly embrace it.
Defenses of indecent exposure to impressionable minds and souls prove that the “tolerance” preached in years past was always a smokescreen.
Generations Of Grooming
The end goal of the LGBT agenda does and has always reached far beyond the original public demands that states recognize same-sex marriage and expand protections to “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.”
Yet, some of the hottest cultural controversies involving the alphabet cult are elevated by Democrats and corporate media because they claim to promote “tolerance.”
In reality, LGBT-forward programming like Drag Queen Story Hours and “family-friendly” sex shows are plagued with exhibitionism aimed at children, such as flashing crotches and other private body parts, touching breasts, and teaching sexually suggestive dance routines.
As parents’ rights activist Christopher Rufo noted in a 2022 exposé, Drag Queen Story Hour specifically was created to be a vehicle for “the deconstruction of sex, the reconstruction of child sexuality, and the subversion of middle-class family life.”
“The ideology that drives this movement was born in the sex dungeons of San Francisco and incubated in the academy,” Rufo warned. “It is now being transmitted, with official state support, in a number of public libraries and schools across the United States.”
The result of the widespread facilitation of what so-called “conservatives” like David French infamously dubbed “one of the blessings of liberty” was a string of incidents in which sexual predators posing as ushers of tolerance were granted inappropriate access to children.
LGBT activists claim these are anomalies that don’t represent their alphabet agenda. But there’s no denying that the “not-at-all-secret gay agenda,” — if permitted to continue unquashed — will inevitably result in “anomalies” becoming the norm.
Don’t take my word for it. Take theirs.
A mere two years later, the supposedly satirical song about “quietly and subtly” forcing the LGBT agenda on children was outdone by hundreds chanting “We’re queer, we’re coming for your children” in the New York City streets.
Events such as NYC pride are painted by people like Alyssa Farah — who corporate media pretend is a conservative — as a “fun& family friendly event.” That could not be further from the truth.
If the years since Obergefell showed us anything, it’s that the alphabet cult’s ultimate goal is to distance vulnerable minds and souls from their protecting parents.
This is evidenced by every part of the left’s attempt to cover up their radical sexual agenda.
It’s why President Joe Biden’s White House claims it’s “vital” for “our” kids to be exposed to naked adults and obscene content in classrooms. It’s also why the Trevor Project — the same LGBT organization that manufactures unreliable surveys to justify the mutilation of minors –created an online chatroom where young children are encouraged to converse with anonymous users — including adults — about sex, sexuality, kinks, masturbation, and other topics that they want to hide from their parents.
The warning signs about this increasingly perverse agenda were always there, but the Frenches, the Farahs, and the weird Twitter tech bros of the world brushed them off. The spineless congressional Republicans and Supreme Court justices who were far too willing to rubberstamp the left’s latest transgressive ideology followed suit.
For too long, the political right refused to nip the left’s sexual debauchery in the bud. They didn’t just buy the “tolerance” lie, they actively tried to sell it to the American people with ill-named marriage acts and twisted rulings.
Now, children are paying the price for prior generations’ passive acceptance with their innocence.