It all just goes to show how government regulation can be silent, but deadly.
No longer taking money out of working families’ paychecks to send upper middle-class kids abroad seems like a good place to start.
A long list of professors have agreed to challenge their classrooms, and this will make a difference within the lecture halls, but that’s not enough.
You have the right to free speech as an American – you have no right to use YouTube to do it.
Do Republicans really think that fewer than 5,000 appointees can win against 2.8 million federal employees who have a vested interest in absolutely nothing changing?
The government is basically a giant Human Resources Department with tanks, and the president is in charge of it. A monarchy saps that ridiculous self-importance.
Uber and Lyft were noticeably absent from SXSW this year, damaging Austin’s reputation as a tech hub. The city’s political leadership is to blame.
Oh, the stories cars could tell about the foolish consequences of government overreach.
Texas Rep. Lamar Smith, chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, has accused the EPA of cooking the scientific books to justify oppressive and costly regulations.
Nobel laureate Angus Deaton recognizes the plight of America’s poor, but he’s reluctant to say the poor are often the authors of their own misfortune.
Those known as the ‘resistance’ are fundamentally and potentially irrevocably altering the norms of civil discourse rooted in the First Amendment.
Obama ‘abus[ed] the Department of Justice to bankrupt, harass, and punish many of Obama’s political opponents,’ says target Steve Stockman. These abuses rival the Wisconsin John Doe dragnet.
If Trump wants to reduce the corporate income tax, he should cut at least some of the $147 billion the government spends on research grants.
Obama-era rules empower meat inspectors to become speech inspectors, and that’s created a crazy situation at one farm in Michigan.
Democratic state legislators want to require presidential candidates to publicly disclose their tax returns. There’s a constitutional problem with that.
SpaceX doesn’t cut NASA in when it uses NASA facilities—our facilities—to launch rockets carrying private cargo, which he gets paid for effectively twice.
The Supreme Court’s ability to issue a binding opinion on any subject that no one else could overturn is inconsistent with the checks and balances the Framers crafted.
Given the current political culture of California, separating it from the rest of the United States would be in the best interests of both parties.
- How The Fourth Circuit’s Support For ‘Assault Weapon’ Bans May End ThemThe Fourth Circuit’s wild departure in Kolbe may be wcontinue reading >
- United Benefit Holders Aren’t The Only Ones Who Should Stop Wearing Leggings On FlightsAmericans have developed a bad habit of dressing like scontinue reading >
- Research Problems Unravel Liberal Narrative Alleging ‘Everyone Is Racist’Years of sensational coverage has made the ‘implicit continue reading >