Upping the ante in Syria would be politically disastrous for the president, and more important, it would damage America’s national security. Here’s why.
While many are calling this a sign of American isolationism, administration officials maintain the real problem is that the compact threatens U.S. sovereignty.
The questions people should really be asking are why Syria joined the Paris agreement and why it chose to do so now, two years after the agreement was first adopted.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for the Syrian ceasefire to culminate in some sort of peaceful resolution, or even last long. We’ve been down this road before, folks.
Islam will not allow minorities to have their own land and to rule themselves. That’s why even if partitioning Syria happens, it likely won’t go well.
Can one support freedom and security for both majorities and minorities? This is the biggest question looming over U.S. policy in the Middle East, particularly for our involvement in Syria.
The U.S. has spent billions in training and support for Syrian rebels—the same rebels now willing to work with the terrorists responsible for 9/11.
The United Nations operates on a failed theory of diplomacy that gives your opponent the benefit of the doubt that he wants the same thing as you. Another word for it is naïveté.
- Censure Vote Against Kyrsten Sinema Is Why We Can’t Have Nice ThingsDemocrats' very public reprimand of Sinema is not aboutcontinue reading >
- Another Day, Another Shooting. Boring!You didn’t read about it? Probably not. That’s becacontinue reading >
- The Entire News Media Is Biased. They Should Just Embrace ItLet’s dispense with the fiction that the media is objcontinue reading >