Reducing tensions with North Korea (and saving millions of dollars in the process) is an obvious good that’s coming from Trump’s recent decision.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s patient approach may be politically risky, but it is strategically safe. An unprovoked attack from the Kim regime is deeply implausible.
That the Kim Jong-un regime is oppressive is not up for debate, but the wisdom of pledging the United States to preventive military intervention in North Korea most certainly is.
President Trump’s Afghanistan plan is, above all, a pledge to double down on the bipartisan failures of the last decade and half, making changes only for the worse.
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis is so far doubling down on a failed status quo, dragging out a strategic loss already bought at a dear cost.
The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force has now been used by three successive presidents representing both parties to wage war without geographic or chronological limit.
The U.S. has spent billions in training and support for Syrian rebels—the same rebels now willing to work with the terrorists responsible for 9/11.
U.S. efforts to remake Afghanistan in its own image fostered corruption and cronyism, a new report finds.
- Is Sexual Autonomy Worth The Cost To Human Lives?We might look at the modern dating world and ask ourselcontinue reading >
- I’m A Legitimate Asylum-Seeker, And I Support Trump’s Border WallLike many people, I used to think President Trump was econtinue reading >
- Why Rashida Tlaib’s Holocaust Comments Were PropagandaHow might Democrat Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s comments aboucontinue reading >